You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.

我以後盡量都唔會幫襯STEAM,出HL3都係咁話

本帖最後由 anthonyko 於 2015-4-28 09:44 編輯

Valve removes option to sell 'Skyrim' mods
http://www.engadget.com/2015/04/ ... kyrim-mod-payments/

睇新聞先知...

TOP

Valve都係一間公司
GabeN都係一個生意人
Valve本身都係靠mod出身
後黎就做賣game賺到爆
宜家就本行唔做,唔出game,齋靠轉賣賺錢

TOP

回覆 3# vigiloconfido


    發行 (Distribution) 都係生產中重要一環

TOP

本帖最後由 chriskbchan 於 2015-4-28 11:07 編輯

其實玩 Skyrim mod 唔一定要經 workshop, 事實上 Nexus 更好用.
另外 Skyrim 今個星期有 free weekend

TOP

你唔認同Paid MOD邊一方面?
如果係利潤30%比左Valva, apple,google都係抽30%水啦
45%比左Bethesda, 呢D係royalty fee, 我諗可以傾
破壞左MOD文化? 又唔係唔比free MOD, expert級數收唔收佢自己諗,
點解唔可以比一D indie未滿, amateur以上既人, 試下身手, 增加多D incentive呢?

TOP

回覆 6# Adele


    25% for modder is not much of an incentive,
    They probably get more from donations, the cut from PayPal, e.g, is minimal.

TOP

你唔認同Paid MOD邊一方面?
如果係利潤30%比左Valva, apple,google都係抽30%水啦
45%比左Bethesda, 呢D係ro ...
Adele 發表於 28/4/2015 11:29 AM



    MOD原作者得番25%
我就一定不會買
原廠坐著就有人幫佢做MOD收錢
以後仲有廠願意認真做GAME嗎?

有人願意無償做MOD
吸引了更多人來買原版遊戲
其實原廠已經賺了
沒必要再削一筆

TOP

my biggest concern is that the workshop for skyrim is not curated, meaning there is absolutely no quality control for mods. And given that bethesda games are buggy and broken, there is a very good chance your paid mod to not work and/or break your game. The 24 hr refund window is not enough for any proper play testing.

What about mod piracy? Valve only leaves that to the community to police. That is not enough.

I'm glad valve take this down because it has too many problems, it won't work.

TOP

Agree 25% 比原作者真係好樣衰

TOP