AMD CEO says that every laptop on earth has enough processing power

Personally, I thought we were over this? I think the whole AMD versus Intel thing ended when we moved into multiple cores? Intel, in my opinion, is so far out in front right now, that CPU power just doesn't have the same effect it did years ago. You can upgrade from a Core i3, to a Core i5 and if you're not utilizing all of that power - is there a difference? If you're using your PC for Facebook and e-mail and move from a dual-core AMD to a quad-core AMD, do you notice the difference?

http://www.tweaktown.com/news/24253/amd_ceo_says_that_every_laptop_on_earth_has_enough_processing_power/index.html

This assumption is so funny.

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

TOP

大多數用戶,640k 記憶體已經夠用
pun1407 發表於 23/5/2012 23:59

.... 無 圖 和 影音 的話, True!

TOP

本帖最後由 toylet 於 2012-5-24 01:24 編輯

Multiple cores is about multi-tasking and system monitoring/protection!
AMD 攪慳電出 APU 其實兮正確方向.....

TOP

To AMD CEO: but I still want more

TOP

又係事實WO~~

不過AMD都係努力D搞好 IO啦~~

TOP

對於大部分只係上下網既人應該係夠
不過唔少人就算係用唔到,都會揀比多D,去買粒勁d既U
呢d係人既心理

睇埋後面,講埋cloud
應該係amd未來其中一個目標

TOP

This assumption is so funny.
MrWhite 發表於 23-5-2012 11:34 PM


If that's the case
Moving from Phenom II X6 to a Faildozer "8-Core" is the same
no different but slower

Why should I upgrade from Phenom II X6 to Piledriver then

TOP

本帖最後由 toylet 於 2012-5-24 20:59 編輯
Moving from Phenom II X6 to a Faildozer "8-Core" is the same
no different but slower

希望不是和 Intel 合謀, 互扯貓尾, 等用家轉 (platform) 來轉去!

TOP

Dual  Core Notebook  it's good for many but all
Some ppl want MORE POWER MORE POWER MORE POWER

TOP