HK use the most cheapest digital broadcast

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Before ranting you should at least do some homework and learn that it is the video compression format chosen by the authority (MPEG-2 in Japan and MPEG-4 AVC in Hong Kong) that causes the decoder requirement difference, but video compression format has (almost) nothing to do with the aforementioned standards. DMB-TH allows MPEG-2 video streams whereas region like Brazil, while using ISDB standard, encodes video in MPEG-4(AVC) format. This renders your statement "ISDB-T is far better than DMB-TH" a complete nonsense.

[ 本帖最後由 cytam 於 2009-8-28 15:59 編輯 ]

TOP

哈....純路過....

咩run-on sentence, comma slice, 一再經典示範, 嘆為觀止。

TOP

我都唔想佢用DMB-TH㗎,
如果係用DVB-T 咪幾好.
全世界都用DVB-T,除咗美洲,日本 等地區

[ 本帖最後由 chifung82 於 2009-8-28 16:15 編輯 ]

TOP

弊在拳拳要擦阿爺鞋呢!

TOP

又返到一個問題, 究竟你地知唔知DMB-TH同ISDB-T/DVB-T係乜野, 有乜分別?
上左DVB-T既後果係點? 而家既問題用DVB-T會解決到?

"When I tried those HD USB in HK, it required a higher processing unit.
ISDB-T is far better than DMB-TH."
日本用MPEG-2, 香港用MPEG-4 AVC, 呢個先係處理能力分別既主因, 你搞掂D concept先講啦。
Anyway我好有興趣知道你有冇試收日本地面波HD。

就好似一架日本車, 載住4個細食既人, 同一架大陸車, 載住4個大食既人, 咁佢地既食量同架車係冇關係既.....

日本地面高清得MPEG-2 12Mbps左右, 唔會好過香港MPEG-4 AVC 12~14Mbps, 但不得不否認人地背後production line成熟過我地好多

講產品選擇, ISDB-T比DMB-T仲要差九幾皮, 日本機拎到黎香港又用唔到, 至少中文會炒。

[ 本帖最後由 kennylam777 於 2009-8-28 17:10 編輯 ]

TOP