[測試] [轉貼]AC87U 測試with 最新firmware (3.0.0.4.376.2769 2014/09/22)

http://www.7tutorials.com/review ... er-batman-would-use

finally 快過ac68u

很想買AC87U

TOP

很想買AC87U
SEMAJ 發表於 2014-12-19 11:28



    我都諗緊87u or 68u 差370蚊

TOP

我都諗緊87u or 68u 差370蚊
benny8888 發表於 2014-12-19 11:37



    最衰87個USB 係前面仲要有蓋
15年新router會幾時出?

TOP

我都諗緊87u or 68u 差370蚊
benny8888 發表於 2014-12-19 11:37



    ac68u 唔夠用咩?

TOP

ac68u 唔夠用咩?
s001168 發表於 2014-12-19 14:17



    一來會用n年, 咁買d四條棍for未來好d??
    二來68u出左成年??

TOP

最衰87個USB 係前面仲要有蓋
15年新router會幾時出?
EVIS 發表於 2014-12-19 13:46



    係前面係fix usb3 會同2.4ghz jam

TOP

係前面係fix usb3 會同2.4ghz jam
benny8888 發表於 2014-12-19 14:21



即係依家87U 用USB3.0 冇影響?

TOP

我都諗緊87u or 68u 差370蚊
benny8888 發表於 2014-12-19 11:37


差$370緊係AC87U啦

TOP

本帖最後由 benny8888 於 2014-12-19 19:47 編輯
即係依家87U 用USB3.0 冇影響?
looking4mp3 發表於 2014-12-19 17:52



    http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/w ... howall=&start=3

"My last stress test was to check for interaction with USB 3.0 storage. Routers with USB 3.0 ports must take care with internal design and shielding to prevent impairing 2.4 GHz radio performance (and vice-versa) when both are active. ASUS' RT-AC68U is an example of poor USB 3.0 port design. In our retest, the AC68U's USB 3.0 port storage throughput looked the same as USB 2.0 with the Reducing USB 3.0 interference setting disabled.

ASUS moved the USB 3.0 port to a front corner of the AC87 and this design looks successful. In the First Look, I found filecopy performance using the USB 3.0 port was much improved with 50 MB/s writes and almost 70 MB/s reads.

For this test, I used a different computer and test file than used for the First Look Filecopy tests, so results are different. The screenshot below shows a drag-and-drop filecopy of a single 1.15 GB Windows backup file from the computer connected to the AC87's LAN side to a WD Passport USB 3.0 drive shared by the AC87 as an NTFS formatted folder."

TOP