值唔值得為Hardware NAT 而放棄OpenWRT,轉用stock firmware

而家我淨係要求個firmware穩定可靠,之前用過stock firmware,發現有時會有package loss,用OpenWRT又冇Hardware NAT
請問一下各位Ching我應該點揀好?

本帖最後由 solexkey 於 2016-12-1 00:11 編輯

如果你有把握debrick router,可以試吓用openwrt一輪比較吓先再決定用唔用番factory rom

TOP

而家我淨係要求個firmware穩定可靠,之前用過stock firmware,發現有時會有package loss,用OpenWRT又冇Hardwa ...
eth0 發表於 2016-11-30 21:03



如果條wan/隻router行盡得100m又唔多BT就值得用OpenWRT...冇HW NAT都冇咩影響
我部841nd都係因為有OpenWRT而起死回生

TOP

用緊邊隻?你肯定package loss係stock firmware問題?
咁就試下third party firmware先,唔掂再flash返stock firmware

TOP

其實而家有D router有能力食到1000m wan to LAN without using hardware NAT
要似乎你想穩定還是Throughput.
利申:用緊Linksys wrt 1900ac v2, BB1000,openwrt下跑滿速

via HKEPC Reader for Android

TOP

如果條wan/隻router行盡得100m又唔多BT就值得用OpenWRT...冇HW NAT都冇咩影響
我部841nd都係因為有OpenW ...
1597532468000 發表於 2016-12-1 00:51

而家有冇 router 行 arm cpu 刷左 OpenWRT

wan to lan 可以食盡1gb ?

TOP

行得盡....行到下...同長期BT行住唔死...有HARDWARE NAT差好遠LO

TOP

其實而家有D router有能力食到1000m wan to LAN without using hardware NAT
要似乎你想穩定還是Throughput ...
321 發表於 2016-12-1 12:42

https://community.linksys.com/t5/Wireless-Routers/WRT1900AC-OpenWRT-Performance-Testing-including-adapters-AC580/td-p/815510

WAN to LAN throughput:  559.853 Mbit/s

TOP

回覆 4# itpeanut


用緊WR1043ND v2.1 ,之前試過STOCK有package loss,轉openwrt又無呢個問題,不過openwrt好食cpu

TOP

而家有1個NAS長開bt同埋WEB SERVER

TOP