舊果枝EF 70-200 f/4L 冇防震,停產未?

本帖最後由 manman1998 於 2014-11-10 19:49 編輯

仲有冇得買&畫質係咪同有防震枝一樣?

仲有冇得冒&畫質係咪同有防震枝一樣?
manman1998 發表於 2014-11-10 19:47



   
no,  70 200 F4 IS does have better performance than non IS in my opinion

TOP

本帖最後由 manman1998 於 2014-11-10 19:53 編輯
no,  70 200 F4 IS does have better performance than non IS in my opinion
anonymoushk 發表於 2014-11-10 19:49


$8k尾 VS $5k零

幫人問,佢標血嘞

TOP

$8k尾 VS $5k零

幫人問,佢標血嘞
manman1998 發表於 2014-11-10 19:51



   
如果 apsc 用, 支 55 250 STM 隨時好過 70 200 IS .__."

full frame 就另計
我上次同場試支 F4IS 靚過舊既 2.8 / 2.8IS

70 200 IS II 都有分唔同 copy ,邊D既位都睇得出有分別 =[

TOP

佢買5D3加24-70/4L,都係叫佢唔好諗小白住好D

TOP

佢買5D3加24-70/4L,都係叫佢唔好諗小白住好D
manman1998 發表於 2014-11-10 20:19



   
TELE 有大買大,除非唔想搬/貴

有時連 RAW 可以推果一級都偷埋出黎用都係啱啱好夠快門速度… (6400 iso / F2.8 / 1/400)

TOP

回覆 6# anonymoushk


    f/4L is果枝都幾得下咁

TOP

回覆  anonymoushk


    f/4L is果枝都幾得下咁
manman1998 發表於 2014-11-10 20:26


yep , unless you really need that 2.8 , 70 200 F4 IS  are much much lighter than the 2.8

TOP

買支 A009 把
2.8 重有 VC
唔洗一味推 iso
用起來都醒神d"

TOP

個事主係新手來,不過原來有做功課,都係要原
廠小小白,咁到時睇佢要 f/2.8L is一代定 f/4L is了

TOP