乜而家奸郎係d鏡頭QC、CS差左定樓主黑仔?

呢位Ching好不幸......

http://www.dchome.net/forum.php? ... &extra=page%3D1

唔係當時人,好難知件事係點。

TOP

呢位Ching好不幸......
WAI2 發表於 2015-4-14 18:21



    只可以講黑仔 , 我會嘈日本CANON(日本PR比較怕事多數賠償了事) 多過CANON HK ,

TOP

羅生門,公說公有理,婆說婆有理

TOP

我只能說成成報多七成機價比我,唔買都有火

TOP

我只能說成成報多七成機價比我,唔買都有火
cchhll 發表於 2015-4-15 04:48

成成雖貴…但佢信譽已經算好?

TOP

本帖最後由 pc1668 於 2015-4-15 10:08 編輯

Having tried numerous brands of SLR (film) in the past decades, I've had used 奸郎 SLR for about 10 years (starting with AE-1).  Then switched to their DSLR for yet another 10 years+.  I would say, their QC (especially since the switching from film to digital) were always no good.   The L glass QC was the worst area in particular.

Long story short (not to repeat my bad experience in details), QC was one of the main reasons that made users (at least I am one of those ...) switching to other brands (mostly to N).

TOP

成成雖貴…但佢信譽已經算好?
rickee 發表於 15-4-2015 08:42


當事人我就不評論啦 (要評就上屋仔講啦)

件事教訓大家... 去鋪頭買鏡時要上機身試清楚 @@

(如果外國網購, 預到呢D事, 應該9成9有得退貨吧...)

TOP

...姐姐靚左, 態度好左...
agree

TOP

原來2013 年以討論類似問題。主要因大部份零件用外判,QC 管不到,适成近年CANON QC 唔得。
http://www.hkepc.com/forum/viewt ... p;extra=&page=4
日本「週刊東洋経済」特集「日製Canon輸給泰製Nikon"
唔知文章仲見不見到。但由於NIKON 始終原廠,QC 自己可以管到,而CANON 就外判,就算有問題,NIKON 即可調查生産線那裏出問題,反而CANON 就未必即時查出。

TOP