Canon 1吋感光長炮G3X有官方消息(更新香港售價及測試)

本帖最後由 hihihellohihi 於 2015-7-3 13:56 編輯

美國官方網頁有更新,除左鏡頭方面其他spec都幾滿意,唔知其他ching點睇
http://usa.canon.com/cusa/consum ... eras/powershot_g3_x

本帖最後由 Eddie_Wong_F-14 於 2015-6-18 20:05 編輯

1吋 CMOS 配 28-600mm 都有 f/3.5-5.6, 算係咁啦
不過無閒錢買

*應該係 f/2.8-5.6

TOP

1吋 CMOS 配 28-600mm 都有 f/3.5-5.6, 算係咁啦
不過無閒錢買
Eddie_Wong_F-14 發表於 2015-6-18 19:56


唔係f/2.8 (W), f/5.6 (T)咩…?何來 3.5?

TOP

唔係f/2.8 (W), f/5.6 (T)咩…?何來 3.5?
pigmich 發表於 2015-6-18 19:59

Oops, sorry, 記錯

TOP

TOP

the spec looks good

TOP

想買,但睇完五軸防震有三軸係電子,都係玩下實機先
http://gizmodo.com/canon-g3x-my- ... our-zoom-1711963595

TOP

本帖最後由 pc1668 於 2015-6-19 15:09 編輯
想買,但睇完五軸防震有三軸係電子,都係玩下實機先
mokngaihong 發表於 2015-6-19 12:05


There is a general norm of almost all super-zoom lenses, the IQ at wide to mid range would always be better (much) than that of the tele-end.  

Albeit a 24-600mm F2.8/5.6 super zoom is very attractive/versatile, experience tells us that the tele-end was usually for emergency only. And the IQ would be at next-to-useless level (if we were a bit picky).  However, if the final production unit could deliver very usable IQ at the tele-end, the G3X would be a very competitive product in the market.

In addition, I don't think the lag of 4K video capability would be a matter of concern ... anyway, 4K video is not everyone's cup of tea.  However, the so-called "5-axis stabilization" ... is a bit tricky !

TOP

旅行唔錯

TOP

唔知開幾錢呢 好有興趣

TOP