Nikon 16-35/4 水貨點解平過行貨咁多架呢?

本帖最後由 sonycliepda 於 2015-6-21 23:22 編輯

Nikon 16-35/4  水貨點解平過行貨咁多架呢?水貨只係六千幾,但行貨要成九千,相比Nikon 另外支24-70/2.8 水貨同行貨只相差一千蚊度,點解有咁大分别呢?

回覆 1# sonycliepda

標準答案:行貨食水深。

TOP

你係邊度見到?小心個D上樓店,有D會將二手當新賣。

TOP

回覆  sonycliepda

標準答案:行貨食水深。
高登阿伯 發表於 2015-6-21 23:29



   但又唔見支24-70/2.8 水貨會平過行貨咁多呢?

TOP

回覆 4# sonycliepda

咁支24-70/2.8水貨同行貨乜價先?

TOP

I've been using N16-35 (行貨) for more than 5 years.   The price is so stable, long ago selling at 9k+, currently also selling at 9k+.

TOP

回覆  sonycliepda

咁支24-70/2.8水貨同行貨乜價先?
高登阿伯 發表於 2015-6-21 23:50


水貨約九千幾, 行貨約萬二左右。

TOP

回覆 7# sonycliepda
咁就好正常,做水貨最緊要去貨快,至怕賣唔去變死貨,我估16-35/4去貨去得快,平啲無所謂,相反比較貴嘅24-70/2.8入貨少啲,所以比難下調。

另外可能兩批鏡係唔同期入貨,匯率問題亦係原因之一。水貨商唔同代理,數期多數比較短,代理同廠嘅數期一般較長,甚至可以長到夠同銀行玩遠期外匯合約嚟找外幣數,水貨商好少有得咁玩。

不過講到尾,水行差價都係雙方角力嘅結果,冇話一枝平啲,另一枝一定要平咁多。

TOP

回覆  sonycliepda
咁就好正常,做水貨最緊要去貨快,至怕賣唔去變死貨,我估16-35/4去貨去得快,平啲無所 ...
高登阿伯 發表於 2015-6-22 11:55


N16-35 F4 680g
N24-70 F2.8 900g

Although the target customers are not the same (... yes I know), there are ppl willing to sacrifice the 36-70mm and F2.8 to get a less heavy 'kit' lens (with the gain of 16-23mm and VR).  Indeed, I'm one of them

All-in-all, weight is inevitably a matter of concern.
   
ps. N24-85 VR was not yet released when I bought the 16-35 F4 VR

TOP

香港買好多野都好貴嫁啦, dyson 風扇美國賣平一半, 好多野水貨來到香港扣埋鋪租都仲平過二手, 不過e 支鏡不建議購入.

TOP