JBOD 比 RAID1 更實用?

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

其實無話實唔實用,只有合唔合用。
功能唔同,價錢都唔同,無乜好比較。

TOP

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

TOP

回覆 1# pcand

睇你需要, 但你將系統包裝成存取系統, RAID-1是最低要求. JBOD係冇用.

TOP

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

TOP

本帖最後由 pc1668 於 2016-7-5 12:35 編輯
回覆  pcand

睇你需要, 但你將系統包裝成存取系統, RAID-1是最低要求. JBOD係冇用. ...
polarhei 發表於 2016-7-5 12:01


"將系統包裝成存取系統, RAID-1是最低要求"
Who said so ?

While standalone external backup (multiple copies) is deemed a MUST have backup arrangement, the use of basic (w/o raid), jbod, raid0, raid1, etc., are just one's personal preference (of course he/she has to understand the pros and cons).  Just like someone said: "只有合唔合用".

TOP

RAID1 或是 JBOD 好用?
RAID1 好像只有JBOD 的一半容量...
而且JBOD 又不會像Raid 0 這樣危險, 似乎JBOD 比 ...
pcand 發表於 2016-7-5 02:24


行JBOD不如行BASIC MOUNT AS FOLDER....

TOP

行JBOD不如行BASIC MOUNT AS FOLDER....
s20021139 發表於 2016-7-5 12:33


If you've a few hdds of various capacities (some are quite small, for instance), for ease of data storage, using jbod (or raid0) to create a single virtual volume might be a good idea.  Once again, we need to understand the pros and cons of such setup.

Btw, "basic" is always my cup of tea.

TOP

回覆 6# pc1668

I pay for high integrity, less availability. That's why RAID-1 is my minimum requirement.

Of course, It is suggested to use RAID-5 for the purpose.

TOP

If you've a few hdds of various capacities (some are quite small, for instance), for ease of data  ...
pc1668 發表於 2016-7-5 12:40


我個人覺得JBOD彈性係好, 但要令佢可靠就有難度, 用WINDOWS 既STORAGE SPACE會穩陣D

TOP