Polaris 10 AMD chose to go the GDDR5/X & aimed at mainstream desktop????????

本帖最後由 1112311123 於 2016-4-25 18:52 編輯

http://wccftech.com/amd-polaris- ... is-11-notebook-gpu/
有樣野其實更加重要...
P11打流動市場, P10打DESKTOP MAINSTREAM市場, MAINSTREAM其實係................................
之前印象中AMD好似係話P10有2.5X, 依家得返2X
而FREESYNC FPS COMPENSATION意味住本身FREESYNC要求係做唔到
加加埋埋咁睇好可能......黎緊AMD新卡可能真係得中階水平, 而呢個中階水平係上代嘅980TI水平

呢段野係岩岩新出, 但冇講到乜係MAINSTREAM DESKTOP
AMD demonstrated its “Polaris” 10 and 11 next-generation GPUs, with Polaris 11 targeting the notebook market and “Polaris” 10 aimed at the mainstream desktop and high-end gaming notebook segment.
請注意呢張圖係2015年出, 依家有冇轉到就唔知, 未有最新消息








AMD chose to go the GDDR5/X
We also want to share some information we learned from our sources about Polaris 11. AMD recently hosted a event in Taiwan to showcase their Polaris GPUs (Polaris 10 and Polaris 11) along with the Radeon Pro Duo card to journalists. We shared slides of the Radeon Pro Duo from that event yesterday. People were able to get some info out of AMD and it seems like the Polaris 10 can be an extremely competitive product.

The AMD Polaris 10 GPU has a maximum TDP of 175W but cards will actually consume much less than that. The GPU was initially built to support HBM memory but AMD chose to go the GDDR5/X route since it offers a better value currently. We will get to see HBM on AMD GPUs when Vega launches but until then, only Fury series will have HBM support. The Polaris 10 GPU is said to have 3DMark Firestrike Ultra performance around 4000 points which is about what a Radeon R9 Fury X and GeForce GTX 980 Ti score. By 4000 points, we don’t mean exactly 4000 but it’s actually a bit less than that.


係咪意味住連HBM1都冇 AMD SLIDE仲有冇得假
如果係真, 證明AMD對班FANS冇信心, 明明NVIDIA放哂風話淨係得GDDR5X, 如果AMD用返HBM1, 應該吸引到好多人買, 但HBM貴到飛起, 班FANS可能靠唔住


CHIPHELL有人POST相, 有堅料?
https://www.chiphell.com/thread-1573396-1-1.html
https://www.chiphell.com/forum.p ... &authorid=77139
1. FirePro/Radeon driver可調用完整8G顯存
2. 以後高端卡都會採用FirePro/Radeon driver
3 . VR Display的解析度實為一半,因此以後雙芯卡將是AMD主要策略
4. Pro ​​Duo目前是雙Nano規格,但保留了第三個8pin,將可透過升級bios變成雙FuryX
5. P10全速運作將不會超過175w,並擁有3D Mark Ultra HD將近4k分的能力
6. P10確認支持HBM,但不會採用
7. FreeSync新技術只需更新顯卡driver即可支持, 顯示技術「AMD FreeSync」導入的最新功能 「低畫格速率補償(Low Framerate Compensation,LFC)」, 讓支援FreeSync的顯示器,在遇到畫面更新率低於面板最低更新率的狀況時, 可以避免不流暢的跳格問題。 這代表什麼?P10的FPS比FreeSync的顯示器最低更新率還低

客觀D講, FREESYNC MON最低FPS高到嚇死人, 我好似見過有款MON係要50....
去唔到都算合理嘅, 同GSYNC MIN 30FPS仲有一段距離

本人對現時低功耗主流非常不滿, 出街TDP/POWER壓低佢無問題, 但要留返起碼150W俾痴線佬自己加返上去, 電壓都係!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

唔用hbm但可以平售都算係一件好事

TOP

唔用hbm但可以平售都算係一件好事
calvinchi 發表於 2016-4-25 11:05

我都覺, 跟本FURY系列都唔應該用

TOP

本來想買張Nano用
不過個個都話等埋新卡先
我就懶理用乜ram有冇得oc
最緊要快d推出價錢平返d

TOP

我都覺, 跟本FURY系列都唔應該用
1112311123 發表於 2016-4-25 11:09


咁又唔可以咁講
fury個架構原因本身超唔起,如果唔靠hbm推頻寬分分鐘連4k效能都輸俾980TI
不過hbm未成熟呢點又係事實

TOP

現在用 Gddr5x 才合理

TOP

本帖最後由 1112311123 於 2016-4-25 11:31 編輯
咁又唔可以咁講
fury個架構原因本身超唔起,如果唔靠hbm推頻寬分分鐘連4k效能都輸俾980TI
不過hbm未成熟呢 ...
calvinchi 發表於 2016-4-25 11:16

4K啅頭野, GPU性能跟本仲未追得上, 黎緊呢一代加DX12先叫做有D睇頭
熄哂特效閂AA有乜為
雙卡三卡四卡谷FPS又點, FRAMETIME照樣谷大哂
FURY系列唔玩HBM, 賣平返同級五百蚊, 都大把人買啦
未整好個架構就爭住用, 整好又唔用, 唉, 如果今代AMD用HBM1對NVIDIA用GDDR5, 同級我應該買AMD, 1440P有幫助而且開始夠力

BTW HITMAN 1440P 60FPS條片好似話唔係MAX SETTING黎, 官方好似冇認過, 有冇人有SOURCE睇下

TOP

4K啅頭野, GPU性能跟本仲未追得上, 黎緊呢一代加DX12先叫做有D睇頭
熄哂特效閂AA有乜為
雙卡三卡四卡谷FPS ...
1112311123 發表於 2016-4-25 11:26


fury個FHD同2K效能俾980TI甩幾條街,唔玩4K啅頭真係怕會賣唔出,就算平幾舊都係咁話
我都有用過fury x,知道佢幾斤幾兩,係4K未普及情況下無力挑戰980TI
DX11真係玩死左AMD,呢鋪等睇佢點反cup
利申一下先: 呢次新卡我會用番A卡

TOP

本帖最後由 1112311123 於 2016-4-25 11:44 編輯
fury個FHD同2K效能俾980TI甩幾條街,唔玩4K啅頭真係怕會賣唔出,就算平幾舊都係咁話
我都有用過fury x,知道 ...
calvinchi 發表於 2016-4-25 11:35

咁多REVIEW, 一早見哂底, FURY系列HBM唔應該用嘅問題唔少REVIEW最後都有提到, 可能唔FAIR啦
冇HBM1買唔落...除非NVIDIA仲係輸異步計算....

反而, 谷大電量電壓轉用一體水, 應該幫到手....但兩間廠都一味壓低電量電壓, 唉, 高階卡都咁做, 點玩呀大佬

TOP

冇HBM1買唔落...除非NVIDIA仲係輸異步計算....
1112311123 發表於 2016-4-25 11:40


我覺得只係dx12都夠理由支持A記
而且GDDR5X同HBM1效能分別不會太大,除非原整大核心另計,到時可能真係要hbm2先餵得飽
只追求2K 60全開的話,GDDR5X夠了,呢個市道價錢平先係王道

TOP