作者: saga2005 時間: 2008-10-9 13:04 標題: Tokina124/Tamron 124/Tamron118 upload photo
Which one better for my Nikon D80 ?
借朋友技sigma 10~20MM wide 影的photo ........一用wide鏡就愛上wide鏡影D相真係有一份強裂臨場感,有少少變型重正
有以上幾技鏡D ching.大家出D相份....la,最好用wide鏡影就最好,
Thx all ching
[ 本帖最後由 saga2005 於 2008-10-13 10:51 編輯 ]
作者: Yoda 時間: 2008-10-9 14:26
I don't know about the others, but I like the Tokina 12-24/f4. It is almost as sharp as the Nikkor.
The Tokina 11-16/f2.8 is, to my eyes, slight better opticaly than the 12-24, but the range is too small. I think 12-24 has a much more useful range,
作者: saga2005 時間: 2008-10-10 10:42
Thx i decide buy a secondhand Tokina 12-24 ~
作者: inzite 時間: 2008-10-10 10:46
or buy a 14-24 :P
作者: saga2005 時間: 2008-10-10 11:09
which brand have 14~24MM ?
Beside 14MM not enough wide ....woo
作者: saga2005 時間: 2008-10-10 11:13 標題: 回復 4# 的帖子
U mean Nikon AFS 14-24 2.8G ED ?
天價又唔夠wide.....比支好野我用都係浪費左技鏡
作者: Tef 時間: 2008-10-10 15:00
原帖由 Yoda 於 2008-10-9 14:26 發表
I don't know about the others, but I like the Tokina 12-24/f4. It is almost as sharp as the Nikkor.
The Tokina 11-16/f2.8 is, to my eyes, slight better opticaly than the 12-24, but the range is too ...
to yoda: 其實枝1116當prime得唔得 因為nikon好似無乜低過14mm 既prime. 定係質數用prime仲有一段距離, 唔可以雙題並論?
原帖由 saga2005 於 2008-10-10 11:13 發表
U mean Nikon AFS 14-24 2.8G ED ?
天價又唔夠wide.....比支好野我用都係浪費左技鏡
因為枝鏡跟本唔預你用落dx機
[ 本帖最後由 Tef 於 2008-10-10 15:02 編輯 ]
作者: initials 時間: 2008-10-10 15:13
the color and image quality of tokina 12-24 F/4 is good
see whether you need 2mm wider
the 2mm is big difference in ultrawide.
作者: Yoda 時間: 2008-10-10 17:45
原帖由 Tef 於 2008-10-10 15:00 發表
to yoda: 其實枝1116當prime得唔得 因為nikon好似無乜低過14mm 既prime. 定係質數用prime仲有一段距離, 唔可以雙題並論?
Yes, actually it has only 50% zoom and it is almost like a prime!
It is quite a sharp lens, contrast is good and color is natural. I think its characteristics is similar to the Nikkor 35/1.4 Ai-S.
You can use it for full frame, as a 16mm/2.8. There is a little bit of vignetting at f2.8. For full frame I would much prefer the Nikkor 17-35/2.8, but the 11-16 is so much cheaper!
作者: KinChungE 時間: 2008-10-10 17:48
原帖由 saga2005 於 2008-10-10 11:13 發表
U mean Nikon AFS 14-24 2.8G ED ?
天價又唔夠wide.....比支好野我用都係浪費左技鏡
yes
除非日後諗住升級full frame, 否則冇必要買呢支
作者: ykwokh 時間: 2008-10-11 12:04
原帖由 Tef 於 2008-10-10 15:00 發表
to yoda: 其實枝1116當prime得唔得 因為nikon好似無乜低過14mm 既prime. 定係質數用prime仲有一段距離, 唔可以雙題並論?
因為枝鏡跟本唔預你用落dx機
11-16睇過好多測試紫邊都何其嚴重
作者: Tef 時間: 2008-10-11 19:16
原帖由 ykwokh 於 2008-10-11 12:04 發表
11-16睇過好多測試紫邊都何其嚴重
咁影wide比 F mount dx, 邊枝好?
作者: lsman1 時間: 2008-10-11 19:19
原帖由 ykwokh 於 2008-10-11 12:04 發表
11-16睇過好多測試紫邊都何其嚴重
photonet.de suggest use RAW and then use Adobe Photoshop RAW converter (ACR) to adjust...
作者: gnf 時間: 2008-10-12 14:17
T12-24 應該最抵...
作者: westkenny 時間: 2008-10-12 14:44
原帖由 gnf 於 2008-10-12 14:17 發表
T12-24 應該最抵...
Yes T124 only 38xx now
作者: saga2005 時間: 2008-10-13 10:18
借朋友技sigma 10~20MM wide 影的photo ........一用wide鏡就愛上wide鏡影D相真係有一份強裂臨場感,有少少變型重正
[ 本帖最後由 saga2005 於 2008-10-13 10:42 編輯 ]
作者: zutto 時間: 2008-10-13 14:16
SIGMA 10-20 BY A200 SONY
1
2
3
[ 本帖最後由 zutto 於 2008-10-13 14:18 編輯 ]
作者: kspoon 時間: 2008-10-15 23:45
these pics were taken by sigma 10-20mm
http://www.hkepc.com/forum/viewt ... &extra=page%3D1
作者: saga2005 時間: 2008-10-16 09:04
Ching d 相好得呀 ~