作者: penguinsam 時間: 2017-3-15 19:51 標題: 如果自建 NAS, 點樣可以做到 QNAP 咁, 用 browser 行到 VM?
求高手指點~
作者: wongcc2006 時間: 2017-3-15 20:33
vsphere 6.5
作者: KinChungE 時間: 2017-3-15 21:49
+1, ESXi
作者: sing 時間: 2017-3-15 22:09
用VM行NAS/Guest OS
跟NAS上行VM (e.g unRAID)唔同
樓主要邊樣先?
作者: tingcrab 時間: 2017-3-15 23:37
FreeNAS/NAS4Free有內置phpVirtualBox的……都係login入去個webGUI度開VM關VM設定VM的。

作者: DeLasalle 時間: 2017-3-15 23:44
試下先!!! 可以 vm 裝FreeNAS/NAS4Free 然後再webGUI度開VM關VM設定VM嗎?
作者: penguinsam 時間: 2017-3-16 01:48
In a NAS OS host, create VM guests, I use them just using browser securely when I am at street / office
作者: KinChungE 時間: 2017-3-16 13:44
可以, 不過效能超慢
要VM行NAS, 一定要用Tier 1既VM (e.g. Citrix Xen / Microsoft Hyper-V / VMware vSphere)
作者: wongcc2006 時間: 2017-3-17 00:43
可以, 不過效能超慢
要VM行NAS, 一定要用Tier 1既VM (e.g. Citrix Xen / Microsoft Hyper-V / VMware vSp ...
KinChungE 發表於 2017-3-16 13:44
i think VM > hyper V > native Xen
Xen I use citrix VDI (xenapp or xendesktop) which runs on windows server should better.
作者: KinChungE 時間: 2017-3-17 00:46
i think VM > hyper V > native Xen
Xen I use citrix VDI (xenapp or xendesktop) which runs on w ...
wongcc2006 發表於 2017-3-17 00:43
個人試過VMware同Hyper-V add physical disk
結果後者遠遠較好, 仲要VM入面睇到哂HDD資料, 如型號/SMART
玩VMware要pci-e passthrough成個sata controller先快
作者: wongcc2006 時間: 2017-3-17 00:48
個人試過VMware同Hyper-V add physical disk
結果後者遠遠較好, 仲要VM入面睇到哂HDD資料, 如型號/SMART
...
KinChungE 發表於 2017-3-17 00:46
仲要VM入面睇到哂HDD資料, 如型號/SMART << even configured RAID array? and can view member disk?
作者: KinChungE 時間: 2017-3-17 00:49
本身隻碟響host睇到既就guest都睇到
本身host睇唔到既, guest當然唔會睇到
冇試過再用hdd sentinels呢類野響VM入面再睇
作者: wongcc2006 時間: 2017-3-17 00:54
本身隻碟響host睇到既就guest都睇到
本身host睇唔到既, guest當然唔會睇到
冇試過再用hdd sentinels呢類 ...
KinChungE 發表於 2017-3-17 00:49
In technical I think VM still better. Which have longer history. But the host itseld require less resources to run the core(Linux)
But hyper v is you don't need a extra computer to access the guest vm but the host Windows server will consume some resources (Windows)
via HKEPC Reader PRO for Android
作者: wongcc2006 時間: 2017-3-17 00:57
In a NAS OS host, create VM guests, I use them just using browser securely when I am at stree ...
penguinsam 發表於 2017-3-16 01:48
Yup. Recommend vm or hyper v as base
Then install unraid or free nas for storage (link to data store)
You may install many other guest os as long as you have CPU and ram
via HKEPC Reader PRO for Android
作者: KinChungE 時間: 2017-3-17 01:27
In technical I think VM still better. Which have longer history. But the host itseld require less ...
wongcc2006 發表於 2017-3-17 00:54
VMware係CPU效能方面比Hyper-V高
同埋Management方面遠比Hyper-V Flexible, 強
但係I/O效能始終差好遠
睇情況需要
至於Windows Server, 其實Microsoft有個純Hyper-V既OS, 入到去只得個command prompt, 成個OS boot完只佔幾百MB RAM, 比ESXi更少
但係就冇得直接用果部PC做哂所有management
作者: penguinsam 時間: 2017-3-17 17:13
Yup. Recommend vm or hyper v as base
Then install unraid or free nas for storage (link to data sto ...
wongcc2006 發表於 2017-3-17 00:57
well...sounds complicated
作者: 雯雯 時間: 2017-3-17 19:42
除ESXI外, 仲有proxmox同埋UNRAID OS都可以做到.
作者: 口o口 時間: 2017-3-17 19:55
ESXI同UNRAID我都用過....
不過岩岩學...我諗用ESXI比較好
作者: 雯雯 時間: 2017-3-17 21:24
如果係一般VM用, ESXI好. 如果係玩passthrough, unraid OS好過ESXI.
作者: 1597532468000 時間: 2017-3-25 02:31
個人試過VMware同Hyper-V add physical disk
結果後者遠遠較好, 仲要VM入面睇到哂HDD資料, 如型號/SMART
...
KinChungE 發表於 2017-3-17 00:46
ESXi 玩RDM 行SCSI Mode都睇到哂HDD資料的
不過唔太順...SSD會得番2xx MB/s
HDD明顯會feel到慢過平時
最後我改vmx將隻RDM Disk改成SATA Mode就順番好多
SSD有番4xx - 5xx MB/s...HDD行OS都順番
缺點係show唔到型號同SMART

