作者: tyranid 時間: 2009-6-13 11:30 標題: AS SSD Benchmark
http://web444.we.funpic.de/PHP/f ... 2&download_id=9
http://www.ocztechnologyforum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=58059
It look like Crystaldisk mark to me, anyway it is not a bad idea to play with a new benchmark tools.
BTW, It requires 3GB space to test with.
作者: 7ming 時間: 2009-6-14 19:04
有沒有其他的SSD owner 都post 一下呢?
作者: Qookei 時間: 2009-6-14 19:26
My Result Quite BAD
作者: Qookei 時間: 2009-6-14 19:38
Vertex Result
作者: 屎禾田 時間: 2009-6-14 19:42
Acc.time, Intel快過Vertex好多.......果然一分錢........
作者: Freeman.Zoro 時間: 2009-6-15 00:30
who can post X25-E?
作者: tyranid 時間: 2009-6-15 03:39
Almost same as X25-M, but with a faster sequential write.
Vertex EX comes with a faster 4K random read.
Photo from OCZ forum.
作者: hhpeter 時間: 2009-6-15 15:50
Just want to know when run the test
intel c: is the system
Vertex e: is data
??
[ 本帖最後由 hhpeter 於 2009-6-15 15:51 編輯 ]
作者: tyranid 時間: 2009-6-16 00:25
Anyone can try Summit?
作者: jycw 時間: 2009-6-17 21:05
你隻120G快咁多既..
[attach]875229[/attach]
作者: Qookei 時間: 2009-6-17 21:30
你up上1.30 la
作者: 7ming 時間: 2009-6-17 21:30 標題: 回覆 10# 的帖子
人地firmware新d
快d昇級再試過睇睇
作者: jycw 時間: 2009-6-17 21:35
但我係 60G..
同埋 1.3 好似唔係快左呢 xD
作者: tyranid 時間: 2009-6-18 00:13
1) The 30GB and 60GB drives are about 20 - 35% slower in sequential read and write speed than the 120GB drives.
2) Small file random read/write speed is unaffected. The entire lineup of Vertex drives, regardless of size, performs the same when dealing with small file random access.
3) As a result, real world performance is mostly unaffected by going for a smaller drive. PCMark scores are only around 4 - 5% lower on the smaller drives.
作者: dilidolo 時間: 2009-6-18 04:07
not SSD
作者: chy2003 時間: 2009-6-19 18:28
A-data S592 32GB
作者: tyranid 時間: 2009-6-19 19:47
宜家有埋分
[ 本帖最後由 tyranid 於 2009-6-19 19:48 編輯 ]
作者: hk_traveller 時間: 2009-6-19 19:55
暫時那一個SSD score 最高?
作者: sammy_9_82 時間: 2009-6-20 11:03
我隻ocz summit要行開一邊
[ 本帖最後由 sammy_9_82 於 2009-6-20 11:03 編輯 ]

