APPLE要搞你容乜易
佢又唔係淨係得APP STORE
只要針對你搞搞小手腳 就掂
最簡單係搞到你隻APP成日崩潰 然後 ...
XML 發表於 2021-9-14 14:26


其實哩單野都唔算長了..... 當然, 仲有 round 2,3,.....

TOP

本帖最後由 IanW 於 2021-9-14 15:23 編輯
唔知幾多個claim
Epic提告係app store payment procedure嘅壟斷
而結果係
“Apple must allow other forms of in-app purchase”

你可以避開唔提嘅

你覺得呢單官司,所有人focus喺Epic洗唔洗賠?  Fortnite可以上架?

前面我有講咗
Epic係做咗毀約行為
係抵死


咁你可以話你只care Epic嘅下場

但而家戰場明顯唔喺呢個細到冇人理嘅point囉
餓狼 發表於 2021-9-14 15:01


你閱讀理解係咪有問題???


我唔只有提, 仲有講佢影響, 應該係無大家所想咁大.
這是現在直接最相關的問題.

退一萬步講, 就算重點不同 (雖然我唔覺我只重於 Epic 敗), 點解會變成「扭曲」?

「Epic V Apple Round 1 有結果了」, 請問我扭曲了乜野結果?
附件: 您需要登錄才可以下載或查看附件。沒有帳號?註冊

TOP

單講下架,呢單野鬧大果下已經下左架了吧

Apple可以唔比佢上番架


話說而加App Store係咪仲未有番佢隻要塞英雄?

單野野一搞,連google play都下埋架,我頭先search Fortnite都唔見有
Rosa 發表於 2021-9-14 14:36


無可能上返架了.... 但其他戶口如 unreal engine 果 d 應該無事的.
因為佢一玩就 ios android 兩邊玩, 只係 apple 手起刀落, 快手啫.
同埋 android 仲有 apk 嘛, 其實相對無咁大影響.

TOP

其實我一直都唔知EPIC既目的係乜就真

週圍放火
Rosa 發表於 2021-9-14 15:36


目的係乜? 咪錢囉..... 只係棟支旗「正義」行先, 自然多人幫拖.

TOP

Android APK果邊唔知想點搞,小米居然凸個頭出黎話要封APK,但有得設定

唔知Google會唔會加埋入開發者功 ...
Rosa 發表於 2021-9-14 15:44


其實 apk 向來都係「危險」的.... 因為只要你的來源有問題, 你係唔會知道入面出左乜野術的.

TOP

“ 小巨人差不多算係完敗.
基本上要求的東西近乎全落空, 惟一對 apple 不利的判決都只係令 apple 麻煩左, 未至於收唔倒錢”

佢要求嘅就係係3rd party payment procedure + 免30%抽佣
而家判“Apple must allow other forms of in-app purchase”

同你講嘅落差算唔算大呢? 2中1 都可能解完全落空嘅

你睇咗一編article好buy唔代表全部人睇完都一樣

我都話
去apple fan page 搵多d article 嚟support
一定係apple 大勝
餓狼 發表於 2021-9-14 15:45


「同你講嘅落差算唔算大呢?」
我(其實係篇報導) 係指出左個結果的實際意義及問題. 有乜野落差呢?

我係特登等幾日, 等 d 媒體撚完成份百幾頁的判詞的報導出的.
The Verge 亦唔係乜野 apple fan page.
佢之前唔同人寫的係 both side lost.... 判決當日出的.

我寫左乜野係錯?
篇報導所講是否正確?
如有不正確, 可以指出來嗎?   

基本上 developer 係唔會走得甩 apple 果份的.  apple 只係難左收 (你有可能呃倒佢).
First, and most significant, as discussed in the findings of facts, IAP is the method by
which Apple collects its licensing fee from developers for the use of Apple’s intellectual
property. Even in the absence of IAP, Apple could still charge a commission on developers. It
would simply be more difficult for Apple to collect that commission.
Indeed, while the Court finds no basis for the specific rate chosen by Apple (i.e., the 30%
rate) based on the record, the Court still concludes that Apple is entitled to some compensation
for use of its intellectual property. As established in the prior sections, see supra Facts §§ II.C.,
V.A.2.b., V.B.2.c., Apple is entitled to license its intellectual property for a fee, and to further
guard against the uncompensated use of its intellectual property. The requirement of usage of
IAP accomplishes this goal in the easiest and most direct manner, whereas Epic Games’ only
proposed alternative would severely undermine it. Indeed, to the extent Epic Games suggests
that Apple receive nothing from in-app purchases made on its platform, such a remedy is
inconsistent with prevailing intellectual property law.

TOP

唔...

其他人唔知

我自己真係無直接比過錢EPIC

UE既game就玩過
Rosa 發表於 2021-9-14 15:46


你無啫.... 不知幾多人俾...
單睇個判決結果, 單係 Fortnite 的 revenue 已經係 US$12,167,719

TOP

PC果邊個EPIC我都好想知佢免費game攻勢去到幾時

最近連仁王都黎

雖然我都係玩緊Automachef ...
Rosa 發表於 2021-9-14 16:39


我估至少要佢自身的功能追倒 Steam 八九成啦.
功能上差不多, 入面個 library 又有返咁上下數量, 咁 d 人至會變返睇價錢做人.

TOP


咁就得啦
咁我都係comment緊編article
關你叉事咩
你quote咋嘛

咁編article扭曲囉
OK?

冇人話你錯 ...
餓狼 發表於 2021-9-14 18:39


咁你都講到咁, 又有乜所謂....
做人講錯野又真係唔駛認的, 面皮夠厚就可以了......

完~

TOP

同時MS都做緊野,收購左幾間game公司

新xbox應該點都會黎一波獨佔攻勢

EPIC呢方面又要再追 ...
Rosa 發表於 2021-9-14 16:56


MS 係同 Sony PS5 鬥啫.... game store 好似都無乜得點鬥...

TOP