AMD Temash 測試

Update: The Live Testing session is over. Some notes below.

I’ve just started a live stream while I test the Acer Aspire V5 122P, the AMD Temash-based laptop. The stream will run from now and at 2100 Berlin (15 minutes from this post) i’ll start to introduce the Acer and do some intereactive testing, Q&A with anyone that joins in the chat.

It’s all happening on the live page right now.

Notes from Live Session below.


1.0Ghz is the max clock rate. 1.4Ghz ‘turbo’ seems like a myth at this point.
After 3hrs of testing, 1.4Ghz finally appears. See below.
The 3D synthetic tests show 3F performance at HD3000 levels but it appears a lot more efficient at this level.
The CPU TDP (measure roughly) is about 3W for the four cores.
The GPU TDP (measured roughtly) is between 6 and 8W.
Average power utilisation of the platform if around 7-8W for online usage with 50% screen brightness
Screen has wider viewing angles than basic laptops but not extreme viewing angles
Always remained cool
Sunspider 610ms
Peacekeeper 1184 points.
After some playing with power profiles (honestly, we can’t identify the point at which 1.4Ghz started working) we saw a solid 1.4Ghz clock under mains and battery.

This isn’t a thermally limited short-term turbo boost it’s an increaase in base clock that holds despite load.

Cinebench 11.5 score at 1.4Ghz (with a lame process using 6% in b/g) 1.23 points CPU, 10.33 BpS OPenGL




http://ultrabooknews.com/2013/05 ... amd-temash-testing/
上面係1.4Ghz既test
下面仲有行1Ghz既test


入面仲有片睇
http://ultrabooknews.com/2013/05 ... 6-1450-first-tests/


睇黎tdp應該係甘 temash 4c 1Ghz 8W, turbo mode 1.4Ghz 15W
acer呢個series舊電

上面係1.4Ghz既test
下面仲有行1Ghz既test


入面仲有片睇



睇黎tdp應該係甘 temash 4c 1Ghz 8W, t ...
hioohi 發表於 2013-5-11 15:28


這性能連上代2核山貓APU都難於應付...

1433600756.jpg
2013-5-11 15:58


如果測試正確...
基本上用最雞既 2core Intel Celeon 847 1.1GHz 可以輕易壓制
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/celeron-847.html

TOP

本帖最後由 qcmadness 於 2013-5-11 16:20 編輯
這性能連上代2核山貓APU都難於應付...



如果測試正確...
基本上用最雞既 2core Intel Celeon 847 1.1GH ...
Geek2012 發表於 2013-5-11 16:05


E2-3000M唔係Bobcat

FX-8350 / i7 3770K都係講緊7分左右
2核Bobcat邊可能有1分咁多

TOP



E-350 Cinebench: 0.62
Atom N2800: 0.63

A6-1450: 1.23

TOP

E2-3000M唔係Bobcat

FX-8350 / i7 3770K都係講緊7分左右
2核Bobcat邊可能有1分咁多 ...
qcmadness 發表於 2013-5-11 16:08


但的確係上一代Llano APU 系列

TOP

但的確係上一代Llano APU 系列
Geek2012 發表於 2013-5-11 16:26


你搵Llano同Bobcat比single-thread performance?
咁i7 single-thread performance高過Atom, 實係架

當然, 你唔識山貓=Bobcat, 係十分正常既

TOP

上面係1.4Ghz既test
下面仲有行1Ghz既test


入面仲有片睇



睇黎tdp應該係甘 temash 4c 1Ghz 8W, t ...
hioohi 發表於 2013-5-11 15:28


用電量仲係太高, 打個7-8折就好好睇

TOP

Cinebench 11.5 Multi-thread
G620T: 1.69
A6-3650: 3.14
3-3220: 3.29
A10-5800: 3.31
5-3470: 5.64
FX-8350: 6.89
7-3770: 7.61

Desktop版Jaguar係2GHz左右
即係嬴埋G620T

TOP

E-350 Cinebench: 0.62
Atom N2800: 0.63

A6-1450: 1.23
qcmadness 發表於 2013-5-11 16:15


但4核1G跑出0.85, 4核1.4G先跑出 1.23 的確難看, 單線程性能頗弱, 可能影響用家體驗

TOP

本帖最後由 qcmadness 於 2013-5-11 16:43 編輯
但4核1G跑出0.85, 4核1.4G先跑出 1.23 的確難看, 單線程性能頗弱, 可能影響用家體驗 ...
Geek2012 發表於 2013-5-11 16:40


人地係Tablet APU, 對手係Atom同4核ARM
你用desktop CPU比梗係慢架

TOP