CANON 50F1.4同SIGMA個支比.......

大家會點揀?
SIGMA貴成千值MA?

SIGMA

大眼仔 77mm 成像又好

TOP

如果果支係35/1.4,85/1.4或者135/2就話姐
但係50/1.4...我覺得唔值得晌呢個焦段上面俾多咁多錢

TOP

原帖由 ahshing 於 2008-12-20 12:37 發表
如果果支係35/1.4,85/1.4或者135/2就話姐
但係50/1.4...我覺得唔值得晌呢個焦段上面俾多咁多錢

50mm x 1.6 = 80mm都接近85mm啦

TOP

原帖由 T12 於 2008-12-20 15:28 發表

50mm x 1.6 = 80mm都接近85mm啦


APS既80mm同FF鏡85mm係兩種感覺
50mm始終係一支標頭,我唔相信aps就可以令佢升格
如果係咁,OM一支150/2賣萬幾,咁c/n/s三皮幾野一支300/2.8咪全部可以收檔?

TOP

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

TOP

值唔值多一千->值
但我會揀ef 50/1.4...

TOP

原帖由 ahshing 於 2008-12-20 16:43 發表


APS既80mm同FF鏡85mm係兩種感覺

what kind of 85mmFF感覺? because most books I read suggest this is the length to own...

but for aps-c you need 50mm to make it to this range.

----
So far I read, the AF may be the thing... afterall that's why I dislike my 50 1.8 ... (a perfect combination with 40D LCD....)

http://forums.dpreview.com/forum ... amp;thread=28521872
http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/717198/
http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/717497/
http://www.the-digital-picture.c ... SM-Lens-Review.aspx


and you got to see this.. compare to "Other"
http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/661966

[ 本帖最後由 lsman1 於 2008-12-20 20:22 編輯 ]

TOP

TOP