[開箱] 手痕買咗個 4-Bays ~~~

superguyalan

手痕買咗個 4-Bays
第一次 setup NAS, 希望冇事

ASUSTOR AS3104T

2017-7-11 02:05

ASUSTOR AS3104T

2017-7-11 02:05

ASUSTOR AS3104T

2017-7-11 02:05

ASUSTOR AS3104T

2017-7-11 02:05

ASUSTOR AS3104T

2017-7-11 02:05

pc1668

No offense, asustor's adm is nothing to be proud of.  I had used their nas for more than a year and my impression was, long story short, I will stay away from it!

Regarding NAS products, I've tried the following brands:
WD
Buffalo
Asustor
Qnap
Synology

To be honest, better stick with S or Q.   Personally, I will prefer S.

superguyalan

No offense, asustor's adm is nothing to be proud of.  I had used their nas for more than a year and  ...
pc1668 發表於 2017-7-11 12:57

Why?  The OS is primitive or buggy?
I am a novice and will not use advanced features.
This is the cheapest 4-bays and has more RAM.

dds

回覆 2# pc1668

呢個時候，3千頭4bay,  416 or 416play, 喺最低玩,

除非asustor 4bay 平到1千頭/中.

superguyalan

回覆  pc1668

呢個時候，3千頭4bay,  416 or 416play, 喺最低玩,

除非asustor 4bay 平到1千頭/中. ...
dds 發表於 2017-7-11 16:01

Yes.  <2k.  Intel dual core CPU and 2GB RAM.
Qnap TS-451 may be a better choice but many people say Qnap OS is still worse than Synology.
This is my first time to use NAS.  WD my cloud is my original choice.  I want simple and easy to use.

pc1668

Why?  The OS is primitive or buggy?
I am a novice and will not use advanced features.
This is the  ...
superguyalan 發表於 2017-7-11 15:53

es.  <2k.  Intel dual core CPU and 2GB RAM.
Qnap TS-451 may be a better choice but many people say Qnap OS is still worse than Synology.
This is my first time to use NAS.  WD my cloud is my original choice.  I want simple and easy to use.
superguyalan 發表於 2017-7-11 19:30

Media info tells us that ASUSTOR was founded by a team of ex-QNAP professionals
(can't find the source now ...)

if you say (or many ppl say) ... Qnap OS is still worse than Synology, what do you think of the asustor adm ?

Anyway, dunno if you've the time to do a test.
- Copy 2TB of data (with thousands of files) from local to asustor using some kind of file copy software with verify on (such as fastcopy); pls note that "verify on" is very important
- Make sure it's in non-stop mode ... running for overnight might be required
- If there is no problem, at least the smb service portion is fixed

I had the asustor nas years ago and my requirement during time was so so so so so simple, network file sharing only !!  adm 2.x (forgot which version) smb service was buggy (very), network connection disconnects intermittently.  Files being copied to nas were corrupted (might 1/3 of the batch ...).  Submitted tickets (many) to TW support, having wasted much time to deal with support (in months), nothing was fixed!

In the exact same intranet environment, I've switched from asustor to qnap and things were then immediately back to normal.  I can copy 2TB (or more) files to the nas without any file corruption.

Recently switched to Synology, and I would say, yes the DSM is even better as far as ultra stability is concerned.

If your requirement is simple, not only WD (as you mentioned), S (or Q) can also be very simple.  For instance, I'm using a S 2-bay running Basic mode only, 100% no raid setup!  This is very simple.

ps. WD my cloud has various issues ... better check epc threads

kai_lar

咁大方俾個SN俾人睇呀

superguyalan

Media info tells us that ASUSTOR was founded by a team of ex-QNAP professionals
(can't find the ...
pc1668 發表於 2017-7-12 15:16

Qnap ==> Asustor
OMG.... I don't know this.
Maybe Synology DS416j is a better choice but only 512MB ram.  Is it enough?
I don't like its HDD placement too, stacking 4xHDD horizontally.  I had an enclosure, with a fan, before.  The HDDs were very hot.

superguyalan

咁大方俾個SN俾人睇呀
kai_lar 發表於 2017-7-12 15:50

有乜事?
NAS 唔會出 internet
咁冷門產品, 你揾到第二部去冒充S/N 先算

ckl20002003

冇hotswap ?