求 NAS 推蔍

大家好,
我本身已經有兩部 Synology NAS, 1xDS918+ (4*4TB HDD in RAID 10),1xDS216+II xDS216+II (2*3T HDD in RAID 0),
前者為主機,後者只用來 backup。

現在有一個問題,就是睇相好慢,甚至是睇唔到。我有 800GB 相,估計應該有廿萬張相,
用 samba 開嘅時候,每開一個 folder (每月分一個 folder,內有約三千張相),每次都要等兩三分鐘先 load 完。
用 Photostation 開都係好慢,而佢個 ds photo app 經常 load load 下就 freeze,試過幾部手機都係咁。
用 Moments 本來好好地,但每次一移動完啲相,佢唔識更新返,就算手動 re-index,舊相都仍在,變咗一個個吉格。

基於以上太多問題,加上睇中 QNAP 出咗 QuMagie app 想試下,打算買部 QNAP NAS 兼全用 SSD,只放相,
現有一問題,因我啲相現階段加埋已有近 800GB,而且會不斷增加,
我應該買邊部機比理想?TS-251B or TS-453A or TS-453Be?
我只有兩要求,一是必須用 full disk encryption (全碟加密),二是反應要快,samba load 相最好可以同 local 一樣即時 show 到晒 thumbnail 出嚟。

Thanks.

其實樓主既use case,一糸用 DAS ; 一糸用iSCSI。要加密又要快,我只諗到以上两個方法。

TOP

本帖最後由 pc1668 於 2019-10-11 20:05 編輯

回覆 14# 永恆的回憶

Folder encryption is relatively slow and it seems there is nothing we can do.  As spoke, I have used Q's volume encryption and the performance was quite good, even for entry level ARM CPU (with hardware support of AES-NI).

Yes, quite a dilemma.  As you are using S, I do not recommend switching to Q for the sake of volume encryption.  DSM is far more stable and mature than QTS.

Btw, what is the memory capacity of your S NAS?

TOP

回覆 13# iamderek

謝謝你的提意,不過硬盤加密其實唔係咁信得過,之前某品牌已經爆過大穫。

https://www.itpro.co.uk/encrypti ... ties-ssd-encryption

TOP

回覆 12# pc1668

Definitely, the most prominent drawback of Synology NAS to me is without support for volume encryption! I have not tried Synology without folder encryption as majority of my data need to be encrypted, but I can say that the painfully slow IO of encrypted shared folder is a large push factor to discourage me from using it, even I am using a mid-ended model with Intel Celeron J3455 (with AES-NI).

This is why I always want to try QNAP. But for other aspects QNAP seems behaves weaker than Synology, esp. for iOS app support.

This is thus a huge dilemma to me.

TOP

如果用QTS 4.4.1加Samsung 860 SSD,可以轉用硬件加密,效能損耗更少

TOP

本帖最後由 pc1668 於 2019-10-11 20:03 編輯

I'm a fan of encryption.  Tried S's folder encryption as well as Q's folder and volume encryption.  For mid to high-end models, the IO speed of encrypted and un-encrypted volumes are more or less the same.  However, the IO speed of folder encryption (especially the write operation) is much slower than volume encryption (as someone said, "比正常慢1培").  To be honest, volume encryption is the goal if IO speed has the priority.  

Another drawback of folder encryption is the limitation of file name (less than 14x chars).  I cannot use folder encryption for many of my files coz they are exceeding 14x chars (especially for those having double-byte char set, eg. Chinese char).  Volume encryption has no such limitation.  And the max. length allowed is 255 chars (I suppose).

However, we all know that S does NOT support volume encryption, pity !

TOP

Smb 加密左,比正常慢1培

TOP

回覆 1# 永恆的回憶


    我有少少斷估,如果你所有 Files 都係加密,慢應該好難避免。

TOP

回覆 7# Marshall

等你的 report,thanks!

TOP