win 7 EOL on Jan 2020
chanmingfu 發表於 2019-9-8 16:46


大把 xp 機重行緊

TOP

而家啲 非 Z 板 有晒 Power Limit
隨時你隻 CPU 只可以 8 秒真男人(All cores turbo)
然後即刻陽痿到 標 ...
MelonGx 發表於 2019-9-9 15:50


唔係塊塊非 Z 母親板都好似 ching 講到咁陽春的.

以我買的呢塊 B365 MATX 做例子:
https://www.kitguru.net/componen ... herboard-review/11/
  
細塊細幾箱用家本身就唔期望可以長時間行滿血 turbo boost. 呢塊細板 95W TDP 行到全時 TB 4.0GHz 已經交足功課, 並不是如 ching 所說的只 run 到 base clock, 所以不算陽痿吧?
  1. By default the Turbo behaviour is 4.6GHz short-term turbo and 4.0GHz long-term.
複製代碼
  1. Out of the box the system will stabilise at about 4GHz long-term all-core Turbo with a VCore of about 1.09v. Reported CPU power consumption is about 97-watts.
複製代碼
BIOS 有得解放 TDP, 但要自己攪好 d VRM 散熱. 但滿血 TB 提升的效能有限, 值唔值得攪咁多野, 令到燒電兼發熱勁, 呢層要用家自行取捨.
  1. Raising that power limit to an absurdly high level in the UEFI BIOS results in the CPU having a stable long-term all-core Turbo of about 4.6GHz with a 1.28v VCore, CPU power consumption is around 160-watts.
複製代碼
  1. Under enhanced Turbo modes the CPU VRM heatsink was too hot to hold on to. However, there was no throttling that occurred because of power delivery heat.
  2.   
  3. That said we’d still advise that as a long term solution the user should look to minimise voltage as much as possible and ensure plentiful airflow over the VRM area, particularly if manipulating the Turbo behaviour in the way we have demonstrated.
複製代碼

TOP

解到鎖就係啫,解唔到鎖 8C16T 4.0 打和 2700 咋wo
MelonGx 發表於 2019-9-11 08:23


解唔到銷都行足 95W, 交晒貨, 不是如 ching 所講咁廢拉.

epc.png
2019-9-11 09:02


做乜突然搬龍門?
用 xxx 比, xxx 要行足 TB 高頻, 唔通唔使塊高 watt 底板?

ching 好似唔太明 TB 本來存在的意義. 事實上亦唔係個個用家, 都需要一塊板谷一粒 95W 的 U 以 turbo boost 長時間 ~160W 運作.

TOP