本帖最後由 t101 於 2010-8-4 13:44 編輯
一直post唔到。
Phil，
我唔想同你長久戰。識學嘴學舌就真系唔creative。你唔再講翻topic上的野，我就無謂再回應，浪費其他人看貼時間。
只簡單post D fact.
1. 系，Netscape最後唔夠IE好。但系點解？ 系M$用OS或其他地方賺翻黎o既profit，subsidize IE development，最後打死左Netscape。
就等如百佳惠康打減價戰，以本傷人，D細o既supermarket就死嗮，跟住就可以加翻價。完全系壟斷手法！
Microsoft quickly released several successive versions of Internet Explorer, bundling them with Windows, never charging for them, financing their development and marketing with revenues from other areas of the company. This period of time became known as the browser wars, in which Netscape Communicator and Internet Explorer added many new features (not always working correctly) and went through many version numbers (not always in a logical fashion) in attempts to outdo each other. But Internet Explorer had the upper hand, as the amount of manpower and capital dedicated to it eventually surpassed the resources available in Netscape's entire business. By version 3.0, IE was roughly a feature-for-feature equivalent of Netscape Communicator, and by version 4.0, it was generally considered to be more stable on Windows than on the Macintosh platform.
...
Netscape could not compete with this strategy. In fact, it didn't attempt to. Netscape Navigator was not free to the general public until January 1998,[15] while Internet Explorer and IIS have always been free or came bundled with an operating system and/or other applications.
2. M$ 本來打算逼所有用戶只能用IE，美其名系”系統不可分割”功能。呢D手段系咩呢？比美國告比EU告，先俾個program你switch下個browser。
a) Internet Explorer 4, released in September 1997, deepened the level of integration between the web browser and the underlying operating system. Installing version 4 on a Windows 95 or Windows NT 4 machine and choosing Windows Desktop Update would result in the traditional Windows Explorer being replaced by a version more akin to a web browser interface, as well as the Windows desktop itself being web-enabled via Active Desktop. The integration with Windows, however, was subject to numerous packaging criticisms (see United States v. Microsoft). This option was no longer available with the installers for later versions of Internet Explorer but was not removed from the system if already installed.
b) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Removal_of_Internet_Explorer
3. 如果DOS有問題，系real mode到，其他software vendor發現問題，點都patch到，因為無protection。一到Windows，仲點得？M$有無 undocumented API, 系咪公平競爭？search下就好多。
http://www.groklaw.net/articlebasic.php?story=2007020819534335
4. 你講果D open只系片面，如果系potential competitor睇下點，仲open唔open?
最後，你可以繼續pro你個M$。但系，系可見o既將來，M$系smartphone同Xpad/tablet上系鬥唔過IOS同Android！
WP7都只系catching up，連cut&paste都無，真系無乜期望。 |
簡體版
訂閱頻道
訂閱電子報
發表於 2010-8-4 13:40
| 
