本帖最後由 penthlon 於 2013-6-29 15:51 編輯
有條友仔好矯情咁話HTC哭訴***唔提供AMOLED, 仲大條道理話***留返AMOLED比自己係應該的
為以正視聽, 呢度搜集了相關資料來將事實還原, 去片~
I) Samsung 顯示部門聲稱公平對待所有採購 (9/2010)
Samsung builds AMOLED displays for both itself and its competitors, making recent shortages a potential conflict of interest, as the company could have prioritized its own devices like the Galaxy S over such other popular models as HTC’s Droid Incredible. Instead, claims Lee, all customers — including itself — are given equal access to the limited number of components; Samsung reportedly made its own employees wait on Galaxies so that more would be available for the general public.
Source: http://pocketnow.com/smartphone- ... 0x-increase-in-2011
Samsung Mobile Display provides screens for a number of different companies including Samsung Electronics. The shortages in screens have reportedly affected all phone makers equally with Samsung Electronics getting no preferential treatment for screens for devices like the Galaxy S.
Source: http://www.dailytech.com/Samsung ... ar/article19550.htm
But Lee said that Samsung Electronics' flagship smartphone, the Galaxy S, doesn't get priority over other customers, and that the shortage has affected everyone equally
Source: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB ... 75553352680096.html
不過 Samsung 顯示面板部門並不會大小眼地把最好的東西先留給自家人，而是和市場上所有廠商一般公平公正地進行採購( 是說其它業者三天後再來( 加上手勢 )就會買到的意思嗎？ )
Source: http://chinese.engadget.com/2010 ... in-production-next/
II) HTC北亞主管指***當年策略性不提供AMOLED給HTC (5/2013)
But once the HTC Desire was welcomed by global consumers and telecom operators at the time, Samsung "strategically declined" to supply its AMOLED displays to the smartphone maker, Tong said at a local forum on mobile broadband.
"We found that key component supply can be used as a competitive weapon," he said.
Source: http://focustaiwan.tw/news/aall/201305270031.aspx
III) 當年有博客留意到HTC Incredible飽受AMOLED缺貨影響, Galaxy S卻同時在多國多電信商推出, 並沒有受零件短缺影響 (6/2010)
But what an interesting coincidence. While HTC is scrambling, and failing to meet the demand, loosing frustrated customers, Samsung is able to ramp up the production of it’s own direct Android 2.1 competitor – Galaxy S. And launch it in multiple countries, with multiple operators, almost at once. Without any supply issues at all…
Source: http://www.unwiredview.com/2010/ ... nys-sclcd-displays/
IV) 分析師認為***大力推售galaxy s導致零件不足，並指現時amoled的供應可能不足夠供應***以外公司 (6/2010)
Samsung, the world’s No. 2 handset maker, is to blame for the tight supply of AM-OLED displays, analysts said. The Korean company is aggressively pushing for sales of its smartphone Galaxy S equipped with AM-OLED displays, gobbling up the component supply. Samsung Mobile Display, a joint venture of Samsung Electronics and Samsung SDI, controls 98 percent of the global AM-OLED display market.
“For Samsung Mobile Display, there may be not enough AM-OLED displays to supply to companies other than its affiliate Samsung Electronics,” Kim Sung-in, an analyst at Kiwoom Securities, said.
Source: http://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20100624000765
補充資料:
三星也曾受AMOLED短缺影響需要換屏 (日期不詳)
Source: http://www.badaer.com/news/60.html
三星AMOLED產能在2011及2012年才大幅上升 (8/2011)
Source: http://www.mem.com.tw/article_content.asp?sn=1108240017
歡迎各位如果找到更多線索, 不論對那方有利, 都加上來。 |
簡體版
訂閱頻道
訂閱電子報
發表於 2013-6-28 12:13
| 
，這話題早應該獨立開帖討論，免了在其他話題出現不對題的感覺，令人錯覺大部份帖都在沾上這話題。
靜觀各師兄討論，增智見識，見識。
