Tokina124/Tamron 124/Tamron118 upload photo

saga2005

Which one better for my Nikon D80 ?

借朋友技sigma 10~20MM wide 影的photo ........一用wide鏡就愛上wide鏡影D相真係有一份強裂臨場感,有少少變型重正

有以上幾技鏡D ching.大家出D相份....la,最好用wide鏡影就最好,

Thx all ching

[ 本帖最後由 saga2005 於 2008-10-13 10:51 編輯 ]

Yoda

I don't know about the others, but I like the Tokina 12-24/f4.  It is almost as sharp as the Nikkor.

The Tokina 11-16/f2.8 is, to my eyes, slight better opticaly than the 12-24, but the range is too small.  I think 12-24 has a much more useful range,

saga2005

Thx i decide buy a secondhand Tokina 12-24 ~

inzite

or buy a 14-24 :P

saga2005

which brand have 14~24MM ?

Beside 14MM not enough wide ....woo

saga2005

U mean Nikon AFS 14-24 2.8G ED ?

天價又唔夠wide.....比支好野我用都係浪費左技鏡

Tef

原帖由 Yoda 於 2008-10-9 14:26 發表
I don't know about the others, but I like the Tokina 12-24/f4.  It is almost as sharp as the Nikkor.

The Tokina 11-16/f2.8 is, to my eyes, slight better opticaly than the 12-24, but the range is too  ...

to yoda: 其實枝1116當prime得唔得 因為nikon好似無乜低過14mm 既prime. 定係質數用prime仲有一段距離, 唔可以雙題並論?

原帖由 saga2005 於 2008-10-10 11:13 發表
U mean Nikon AFS 14-24 2.8G ED ?

天價又唔夠wide.....比支好野我用都係浪費左技鏡

因為枝鏡跟本唔預你用落dx機

[ 本帖最後由 Tef 於 2008-10-10 15:02 編輯 ]

initials

the color and image quality of tokina 12-24 F/4 is good
see whether you need 2mm wider
the 2mm is big difference in ultrawide.

Yoda

原帖由 Tef 於 2008-10-10 15:00 發表

to yoda: 其實枝1116當prime得唔得 因為nikon好似無乜低過14mm 既prime. 定係質數用prime仲有一段距離, 唔可以雙題並論?

Yes, actually it has only 50% zoom and it is almost like a prime!

It is quite a sharp lens, contrast is good and color is natural.  I think its characteristics is similar to the Nikkor 35/1.4 Ai-S.

You can use it for full frame, as a 16mm/2.8.  There is a little bit of vignetting at f2.8.  For full frame I would much prefer the Nikkor 17-35/2.8, but the 11-16 is so much cheaper!

KinChungE

原帖由 saga2005 於 2008-10-10 11:13 發表
U mean Nikon AFS 14-24 2.8G ED ?

天價又唔夠wide.....比支好野我用都係浪費左技鏡

yes
除非日後諗住升級full frame, 否則冇必要買呢支