doggiestyle

諗太多.AMD公關答左今次係2+2 3+3 ,硬封左
而且為左確定全架構性能一致, 就算得4核, 都係行2+2,唔係原生4 ...
s84292 發表於 2017-3-17 14:13

做咩要特登搞粒 2+2
良率有咁低咩

ackjac

可能 1600X 1600 跟1800X 1700X 1700一樣
不帶X的反而性價比最高更多人買 都是上到4.0難再上
還有把風扇仔加減  日後會不會有優化令X版易上就不知了

肉腳王

4T vs 8T
qcmadness 發表於 17-3-2017 21:42

我都覺, 2+2不如買I5....所以amd應該I5價賣3+3(6C12T), 2+2(4C8T用來鬥I3)

masseffect

LOL you must be running out of things to pitch. Without the expected multi-thread advantage,  ...
ironmonkey 發表於 2017-3-18 00:56

點會唔夠呢
INTEL 嘅你又唔會咁講？
I7 VS I5，大把人咪一樣話要I7

youarehere

回覆 23# 肉腳王

CCX causes almost no perf hit, & octacore Ryzen w/ CCX still tortures 6850K and 6900K
And deciding 4C8T or 4C4T seems not a question

ironmonkey

點會唔夠呢
INTEL 嘅你又唔會咁講？
I7 VS I5，大把人咪一樣話要I7
masseffect 發表於 2017-3-18 13:21

相近價位之間對比有什麼問題?

ironmonkey

回覆  肉腳王

CCX causes almost no perf hit, & octacore Ryzen w/ CCX still tortures 6850K and 6900K ...
youarehere 發表於 2017-3-18 15:00

Yea, whichever is cheapest and offers the best features wins.

Ryzen platform + hyperthreading  VS  Intel platform + singlethreading + iGPU

qcmadness

相近價位之間對比有什麼問題?
ironmonkey 發表於 2017-3-18 16:41

最大問題係Intel i5同i7在frequency有分別, 而Ryzen R3同R7個frequency差唔多
i5在single-thread performance方面唔會好似i7 7700K咁推上4.5GHz, 但係R5 1600X同R7 1800X都係3.6 / 4.0GHz

掃馬想機

amd就算你幾勁都好啦。

你個銷售渠道甘差。有咩用啊

今晚佢連自己衰系乜嘢都唔知道

忠忠直直終需乞食，哩個道理係人都知道

掃馬想機

諗太多.AMD公關答左今次係2+2 3+3 ,硬封左
而且為左確定全架構性能一致, 就算得4核, 都係行2+2,唔係原生4 ...
s84292 發表於 2017-3-17 14:13

amd pr如果勁嘅話 ，一早超越intel la