必思

14 2.5 未試過

O記 試過 17 2.8 和 1250 都系一般 (差支17 1.8 未試)
所以 20.7 1代 依家$1000 真系超值 ...
Turboaftershave 發表於 2015-6-16 12:57

   兩枝我都有, 14/2.5好過17/2.8好多,但係價錢差一倍

calvin83

兩枝我都有, 14/2.5好過17/2.8好多,但係價錢差一倍
必思 發表於 2015-6-16 13:55

二手價兩支差唔多, 不過我都係買左二手全新的17/2.8(最似老鏡的M4/3鏡頭).

必思

二手價兩支差唔多, 不過我都係買左二手全新的17/2.8(最似老鏡的M4/3鏡頭).
calvin83 發表於 2015-6-16 14:07

    當年我買全新17/2.8幾佰蚊

calvin83

當年我買全新17/2.8幾佰蚊
必思 發表於 2015-6-16 14:09

我支黑色較小有, 同人買左七舊水(有原裝盒). 遲D身痕可能買多支1.7(貪佢有對焦尺方便街拍, 不過味道始終沒2.8咁正).

必思

我支黑色較小有, 同人買左七舊水(有原裝盒). 遲D身痕可能買多支1.7(貪佢有對焦尺方便街拍, 不過味道始終沒 ...
calvin83 發表於 2015-6-16 14:59

    我枝又係黑色喎

calvin83

我枝又係黑色喎
必思 發表於 2015-6-16 15:05

早知叫你賣俾我了.

sigma

兩枝我都有, 14/2.5好過17/2.8好多,但係價錢差一倍
必思 發表於 2015-6-16 13:55

14/2.5係完勝17/2.8
17/2.8對焦又慢又唔sharp, 用kit仲好過佢

sigma

兩枝我都有,佢冇講錯,1442X係好少少,差在冇24 wide
必思 發表於 2015-6-16 13:52

1232係好好用既kit
焦段好用過1442x又再細支d
要12mm又平又細支係得佢
om 12-50同佢又係海軍鬥水兵, 仲要咁鬼大支

sigma

黑色17/2.8我都有, 果時買EM5送既
但我都係鐘意用14/2.5, 好用得多, 兩年幾前淘寶人仔750買返黎

pc1668

睇photozone 1442X仲好dddd
sigma 發表於 2015-6-16 10:26

Yes, I did read these two photozone.de reviews (1232 - May 2014; 1442x - Jul 2012) long ago.  Different generation reviews showing 1442X好ddddd ... hmm

For instance, I've checked 4 to 5 more recent reviews over the net (including MTF chart comparison) ... and they all showed that the 1232 was optically a step ahead of the 1442x.  

Anyway, 1442x deserves better build quality coz it was MIJ (at least) !