本帖最後由 nelsonlee130 於 2017-10-27 17:22 編輯
回覆 47# killuakam
回覆 48# ja6901
相機encoding唔同就真
其實dpr a6300 review果陣已經提過
Sony Super35 6k>4k係非常高汁
"The a6300's 4K detail level is pretty impressive. It's rather over-sharpened in comparison with the Panasonic GH4 and appears to show a little more aliasing at the center of the Siemens Stars, but certainly very detailed... ...The quality is such that some people have tested whether it reaches the professional standard of broadcast quality. And, although it doesn't quite do so, that testing makes clear it's exceedingly capable for non-professional applications."
https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sony-a6300/5
之後嘅評測,錄影部份都有同a6300/a6500比較
就算a9 都係, "Sony's claims regarding image quality appears not to be overstated, at least in terms of 4K detail capture, with the a9 showing better results than the a7S II and a7R II; it also puts up a good showing against the (also oversampled) a6500."
https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sony-a9-full-review/7
可能大家都係24MP 6K>4K oversample, 佢地嘅畫汁已經幾似
同埋都係衰1080p錄影 想靚就要自己4K再downsample
我諗A7R3換左新BIONZ+LSI 錄影都係a6500/a9走線架喇
又, 當要拎到5D4出黎比 |