initials

just depend on your own style...
people like taking landscape/ static things do not really need big aperture and usable high iso...
bring a tripod and everything will be fine...

Tef

原帖由 toracat 於 2008-10-15 11:18 發表
呢個post越講越遠...
本來想講下OM有何特別,
依家就變成OM既特別之處就係冇咩特別.....

有呀 已經唱緊正面  只不過真係特別之處只限我講果d

註:我係大sensor主義者

HenryxHenry

原帖由 initials 於 2008-10-15 14:20 發表
just depend on your own style...
people like taking landscape/ static things do not really need big aperture and usable high iso...
bring a tripod and everything will be fine...

當你懂得看見事物既優點, 咁所有野都變得有用, 但當你執意得看事物既缺點, 咁所有野都變得冇用lor.

至於是否4/3冇big aperture and usable high iso? haha, just depend on you lor.

Tef

原帖由 HenryxHenry 於 2008-10-15 12:46 發表


你咁諗又未免太過器材主義la,

如果你既出品係表達感覺, 咁任何野都可以表達, 就算一支筆畫畫, 就算用電腦畫., 講近d, 現今各dslr, 講真有咩野係影唔到呢? 上面所講既低光拍攝, 4/3都可以, 一樣好有feel.

講真有咩野係影唔到呢?  <--- 我用om影唔到noiseless夜晚人像 無左果種好silk smooth 既feel 以你所講一定係我技術有問題?

刀都有分幾十種 唔同用途啦  唔通又話牛油刀切唔到牛扒係技術問題啦喎  
有時d野係叫physical limitation, 做唔到就唔到 (我唔係話技術唔重要 只不過器材一樣咁重要)

註: 我唔係話特別踩om 只係唔想又一個亂吹 神化一個system 既post又出現  另d新仔以為某某system係無敵

[ 本帖最後由 Tef 於 2008-10-15 15:10 編輯 ]

initials

原帖由 HenryxHenry 於 2008-10-15 15:05 發表



當你懂得看見事物既優點, 咁所有野都變得有用, 但當你執意得看事物既缺點, 咁所有野都變得冇用lor.

至於是否4/3冇big aperture and usable high iso? haha, just depend on you lor.

i can't say OM doesn't have but... it's really weak point of OM...
however, the BIG aperture is not really big compared to C/N's prime lenses.
the high iso performance is really worse than C/N... especially OM doesn't have FF sensor...
i did say i find OM's good point is smaller in size... but the low light performance doesn't worth to be proud of...
i do agree it's not necessary to freeze action in low light
i like long exposure too, but if i want to freeze, i really need real BIG aperture and good low light performance



[ 本帖最後由 initials 於 2008-10-15 15:23 編輯 ]

HenryxHenry

原帖由 Tef 於 2008-10-15 15:07 發表

講真有咩野係影唔到呢?   

人有限, 物有限, 想像無限, 何必往牛角裡鑽呢?

HenryxHenry

原帖由 initials 於 2008-10-15 15:22 發表

i can't say OM doesn't have but... it's really weak point of OM...
however, the BIG aperture is not really big compared to C/N's prime lenses.
the high iso performance is really worse than C/N... esp ...

如果 high iso performance 是 low noise, then you right, om weak is high iso.
但如果多noise會係一種效果, 會唔會有另一種睇法?

initials

原帖由 HenryxHenry 於 2008-10-15 15:30 發表



如果 high iso performance 是 low noise, then you right, om weak is high iso.
但如果多noise會係一種效果, 會唔會有另一種睇法?

LOL... noise is easy to add but difficult to remove
why not having a cleaner picture, and add the noise if i want to...

HenryxHenry

原帖由 initials 於 2008-10-15 15:34 發表

LOL... noise is easy to add but difficult to remove
why not having a cleaner picture, and add the noise if i want to...

haha you get my point  la , there are many way toward target .

initials

原帖由 HenryxHenry 於 2008-10-15 15:41 發表


haha you get my point  la , there are many way toward target .

the point is OM's low light performance is really worse than C/N...
a picture with less noise is more welcomed than one with more noise...
you can easily add some noise to it, but difficult to reduce noise...
you may say having more noise is more artistic... but... not me and people need better high iso performance...