fatmike

I believe the build quality or the design of QNAP seems more professional (with many metal parts, LCD display and hot swapping drive). However, being a QNAP user, I haven't used a Synology before, so this might be a little biased.

For the software side, QNAP is also very well build.  I have one experience that my TS-419P showed a red light on one of the disk. So what I did was pop-out the defective disk and then put in a new one. The NAS rebuilt accordingly...and here came the fun part, I unplugged the power cord by mistake, and then plugged in the power again.  The NAS continued to rebuilt without a hitch...very bit of my data was there!

That's the reason why I would stick to QNAP.  Just my 2 cents.

james97

Previously, I ve used Syn. old version nas.

I have bought Qnap TS-219II recently and so far is ok.

google

不過 ds212裝HD要拆殼+上螺絲，
hotswap function似乎廢了武功
haha88 發表於 2011-12-22 21:44

DS212 唔使拆殼 , 212j就要

nigelmansell

former synology user
has since changed to qnap

very happy with the switchover

very happy with qnap.  

buy whatever your budget allows, but if you want to buy one that lasts and good build quality, buy qnap

jkhung

i use qnap, very early generation QNAP TS-109 Pro touch wood only the external power supply dead and after replace the power supply it still working very fine for almost 7 years already!!

Niel

硬件數據上WIN唔代表實際係真係有優勝之處，尤其係RAM果方面，根本無乜services係需要行咁多既RAM；而CPU ...
tingcrab 發表於 2012-1-10 11:08 PM

212同212j CPU差400MHz，RAM一樣大少，SMB速度已經有明顯分別。

leslieyip

Synology software is wonderful ~~~  DS212 using now

cth6996

未用過NAS，想買2 bay， one for music server, one for BT.

Qnap TS-219P II 可快速置換HD
Synology ds21 ...
haha88 發表於 2011-12-22 19:53

    QNAP

wcychris

SYNOLOGY既USB 3.0快D好D。但係如果你既external harddisk將會用ntfs format既話就唔好用s記啦，因為佢先天既ntfs driver有問題(可見將來都改唔到，因為要S記俾錢買LICENSE)，相同情況下比QNAP慢近半。

karce

synology 的usb 3.0 係無用的，讀ntfs 勁慢，得物無所用