coffeeaddict

如歐洲車比日本車好撞o的又如何，如果好撞o的但人係裡面傷o的又會點？  應該要計對車內乘客既保護先啱。 ...
hyperbola 發表於 2019-8-21 10:42

如果唔好撞一定易死d

via HKEPC Reader for Android

poopies

同size先去比較, 係會有結論
coffeeaddict 發表於 2019-8-21 01:22

Apples to Apples, 但歐洲日本咁多車廠, 點樣可以籠統去比？

好似樓上一位ching用boxy van黎比較, 佢寫"Japanese boxes often lose control / roll over potentially causing injury to your unloved family members.", 但與此同時Fiat Qubo / Citroen Nemo / Peugeot Bipper MPV亦都係Elk test成架反肚, 部野九年前標準都只係得ncap三星。唔通咁又代表所有歐洲MPV都係極度危險？擺明唔係啦。

用地區/國家黎stereotype部車的安全程度根本就係廢噏, NCAP / IIHS大把資料點解唔去睇？

stevechau

IIHS Mazda Subaru都係前名

騎住德國廠...
DGCNYO 發表於 2019-8-21 13:15

IIHS連kill in accident都有車做到mazda subaru咁既grade tim......

stevechau

Good question.  I actually spent whole night finding my old post for you.
I have added this i ...
PPLd 發表於 2019-8-21 09:33

其實係呢一個比較入面, BENZ車長好多同闊一截, 先天物理定律真係無咁易反車
係日本既BOX TYPE車身造得寧舍窄身, 唔好話易反車, 平時公路大風些許果陣開快少少都行唔穩啦
BENZ V-CLASS呢個CASE要搵返岩比例既日本7人車做比較的話, 應該係SIENNA/佛/ODYSSEY果D會好D~

jukeqq2002

歐洲車 vs 日本車

咁本無得咁比
德國MAN 24噸撞 Jazz 唔洗諗啦…
轉番轉FUSO 撞 BMW 1系
都係死

要比應該要係比同級
Jazz vs Fiat 500
Camry vs Jetta
XV vs X1
咁就差唔多

PPLd

其實係呢一個比較入面, BENZ車長好多同闊一截, 先天物理定律真係無咁易反車
係日本既BOX TYPE車身造得寧 ...
stevechau 發表於 2019-8-21 16:13

As you said they are similar size cars.
Like I said before I am not an engineer so I dont care the technical reason behind.
I just see results.

I dont recommend picking random crash photos.
I only recommend taking precise lab tests as foundation for comparison.

poopies

KIA的確有車堆到上去既，IIHS逼到好多廠真係要做野

IIHS對我比較有價值既原因，係佢好重視撞果part ...
DGCNYO 發表於 2019-8-21 20:58

我認同IIHS比較嚴緊, small overlap考起好多廠。佢宜家連燈影都評埋分, 對於外國無街燈的路黎講好重要。至於NCAP評分其實唔難明, 目前標淮只要部車無安全輔助裝置, 基本上就最盡得三星。只要你㩒入份report就會睇到佢每個column的獨立評分：Adult Occupant / Child Occupant / Vulnerable Road Users / Safety Assist, 呢個比星級更有指標作用。

kanduki

其實係呢一個比較入面, BENZ車長好多同闊一截, 先天物理定律真係無咁易反車
係日本既BOX TYPE車身造得寧 ...
stevechau 發表於 2019-8-21 16:13

高身車側撞會唔會翻
套呔咬地程度應該佔唔少比重

如果捃架同V卡士近磅啲嘅日本車
今年已經有架Hiace 300系
雖然改版後俾車撞可能安全啲
但係入到啲地獄車場就反而變得唔多安全