howdy

原帖由 t1174 於 2008-4-26 14:32 發表

不過也不見過有品牌可以自大到可以反對貶義品牌

ms 其實布也只有 guideline 如何用它的 official trademark name 和 logo.
http://www.microsoft.com/about/legal/intellectua ...

just to clarify you are ALLOWED to express your opinion towards certain brand still, if the discussion is relevant.  you still have the freedom to discussion or agree/disagree your opinion towards certain product/company, and you're always welcomed to do so also.

t1174

原帖由 howdy 於 2008-4-26 12:26 發表

well, basically no-one will think they are categorized as "irresponsible users", and thus with similar arguments they are going to argue why the rules are targeting only them but not everyone.

discu ...

argue 可以有, 問題是 admin board 有冇理由正明某 user 是 "irresponsible users". 就是香港是要證明人有罪方是罪人. 可是, admin board 現在的 方案, 就是要假設人人是罪人,
因此我說這次是白色恐怖.
而且. admin board 現在也冇理由說明, 我們為何要對一個 brand 尊重!!

t1174

原帖由 howdy 於 2008-4-26 12:36 發表

just to clarify you are ALLOWED to express your opinion towards certain brand still, if the discussion is relevant.  you still have the freedom to discussion or agree/disagree your opinion towards ce ...

不過在如此白色恐怖下, 人人自危, 我的確好懷疑 admin board 是不是真心 " ALLOWED to express your opinion towards certain brand still, if the discussion is relevant."

howdy

原帖由 t1174 於 2008-4-26 14:43 發表

不過在如此白色恐怖下, 人人自危, 我的確好懷疑 admin board 是不是真心 " ALLOWED to express your opinion towards certain brand still, if the discussion is relevant."

yes.  I can't say anything on behalf on the entire EPC team cos I'm such a little potato here having no say, but I will guarantee I will try my best to make sure you are allowed to express your opinion (positive or negative) towards any brand or product.  That's the most I could do here.

You are definitely allowed and welcomed to comment and constructively suggest to EPC how the rules could be improved (to target irresponsible users, while try to be fair towards the entire group also).  I could have locked the thread after I start it (to make it as an announcement only)  if I don't want to hear any opinion to begin with isn't it?

KinChungE

原帖由 howdy 於 2008-4-26 11:42 發表

本身行之有效的管治, 不應胡亂改變
I'd agree with you on this, but
sad to say, it's some irresponsible users that started those badmouthing on other brands, and that's the reason why the rules were set initially.

點解badmonthing on other brands就唔得先?
如果講既野, 係大部份用家都認同既, 大部份用家都遇到相同問題
咁有乜問題?

[ 本帖最後由 KinChungE 於 2008-4-26 12:59 編輯 ]

t1174

原帖由 howdy 於 2008-4-26 12:50 發表

yes.  I can't say anything on behalf on the entire EPC team cos I'm such a little potato here having no say, but I will guarantee I will try my best to make sure you are allowed to express your opini ...

你lock 這個 post 又不是白色恐怖的更重要說明

[ 本帖最後由 t1174 於 2008-4-26 13:02 編輯 ]

t1174

原帖由 KinChungE 於 2008-4-26 12:58 發表

點解badmonthing on other brands就唔得先?

我之前也有說, 其實, badmonthing on any brands 本來不是不可的, 不過有時 epc 也要有d rules protect 自己的. 可是不見得要強力行到居然在 linux group 出個 highlight post, 警告所有人.

patrickit

EPC 係全香港第一個自我實行網上言論封鎖既網站, 簡直是史無前例.

講左咁耐, 有關人仕依照故我, 莫視internet既自由空間, 忽略大眾會員既利益.
對於某些會員不了解錮中反對原因, 本人深表遺憾.

針對"M$"一字,
此字眼即使係"貶義"又如何? 這就代表是攻擊?
即使係攻擊又如何? 難道internet不准人表達個人想法嗎?
貴站站長, 把自己地位放在比政府還高的地方, 竟然茫顧網上自由,
甘與全世界網民為敵, 年初的"偽人淫照"風波之後, 雖知網民的力量如此巨大, 前車可鑑.
貴站站長大前題把自己放在邏輯謬誤的境地, 以為單據手上的黑名單就可以"維持"網站秩序, 此舉等同沬黑, 犯上破壞網上自由之罪而不知.
貴站如果是受"某些"供應商的壓力, 那請貴站明確地表示, 我相信再沒有人為難貴站的.
聰明人自有聰明人的做法, 何必小題大作? 一字事小, 與網民為敵為不智, 破壞HKEPC之名又誰來負責?

這是我本人對此怪題既最後回應.
我對此站好失望.

t1174

原帖由 howdy 於 2008-4-26 12:50 發表

yes.  I can't say anything on behalf on the entire EPC team cos I'm such a little potato here having no say, but I will guarantee I will try my best to make sure you are allowed to express your opini ...

說真, 我好怕 hkepc 現在的行動, 至終會變成第2個 hk高登.com (只有 吹水 group 有人氣, 但又完成 out off control)

howdy

原帖由 KinChungE 於 2008-4-26 14:58 發表

點解badmonthing on other brands就唔得先?
如果講既野, 係大部份用家都認同既, 大部份用家都遇到相同問題
咁有乜問題?

you're allowed to express your disappointment towards any brand or product still!  The rules do NOT suppress your freedom to do so obviously.