本帖最後由 bam1a 於 2017-1-30 21:48 編輯
應某位師兄強烈建議，我已經稍爲啱啱略讀咗段文，發現個故仔其實更離奇更精彩
更顯出蘋果翻譯能力應該拎1，上唔到大學（無計，小報式傳媒唔會爲準確性而妥協的）
要睇最好睇berkeley side，篇文係三篇中最齊篇幅最完整的
首先cbslocal個段文章（蘋果引用嘅）
Source: Carbon Monoxide Poisoning Killed Berkeley Couple
（略）
The source said that the couple was using a laser 3-D printer that was venting into their residence. Symptoms and signs consistent with carbon monoxide poisoning were found in their bodies.
（略）
標題有“一氧化碳中毒死亡”字眼
跟住佢就指有來源指就係佢屋內存在着“雷射3D打印機”並有抽風措施
蘋果version：
上周一被人發現陳屍家中，屍身呈現一氧化碳中毒徵召，警方召來電力公司和毒物處理專家調查，並把附近鄰居暫時撤離。
經調查後，警方強烈懷疑是死者家中的3D列印機排放出來的廢氣，導致夫婦兩和兩隻貓全部死亡。
雖然係警方，但好明顯佢無話suspect（懷疑），更何況用強烈呢個字眼，即係文法錯誤
跟住蘋果就無啦啦加個專家警告，重要係原文嗰度無講明有明確證據就引用，是否引用錯誤？（唔引用啦，對我哋係無營養的）
後來發現佢引用CBS同new york times，發現兩者都無落呢類引述，懷疑係胡亂增加章節夾字數
結論？
一個冬瓜湯灑加一大包味精嘅味道，已經鹹到飲唔出個冬瓜味嘅感覺
後來睇返fatman樓主個隻berkeley side，先發現佢內容係更新，且更詳盡嘅版本
According to a friend of the couple, they had a small commercially-produced laser cutter that they stored and used in their apartment. There has been some speculation that this could have been a source of fumes.
The friend said “it required ventilation and that he himself had felt sickened by the fumes on one occasion,” according to a Berkeley resident who shared this information with Berkeleyside last week.
簡單引述：某位朋友指佢有部激光切割機並玩過，（之前文章個D推測），然後朋友亦指部機需要一定抽風要求，亦曾經見過因爲佢導致事主病過一段時間
Another friend, Allen Rabinovich, told Berkeleyside there was no indication that the laser cutter was operating at the time the couple died. There was also a small commercially-produced 3D printer in the home, but that didn’t appear to be in use either.
引述：另外一位朋友指部激光切割器根本無開過咁滯，亦指佢有部小型商品3D打印機喺度但都冇開
即係個段文章其實係齊料嘅完整報道，而唔係蘋果引用個兩隻即時報道篇幅嘅報道，究竟外電報道呢類消息使唔使咁快手要出結論？
媽！好亂呀 |
簡體版
訂閱頻道
訂閱電子報
發表於 2017-1-30 01:47
| 
定係懶得查真相。
