I really don't understand...
I am now living in an single apartment, what I consumes are all necessary, except my computer, which is at most 700w.
Before telling me to save energy, and save the resources, why don't you go to those luxury hotels to tell them do not provide so much unnecessary services for living? I believe they must consume much higher energy per person than me.
Similarly, I don't understand why the government don't tell LV not to pack their products in so many layers since the pack itself only produces rubbish, but to ask the supermarket stop providing bags? Only because their plastic? OK, I don't mind whether it's plastic or paper. If paper bags are strong enough, it will be perfect for me; if at the same time it looks as pretty as LV, it will be even better.
It is the same for those large shopping malls with too much illuminating only to make it looks fancy, those firms providing a lot of posts, ads, and litter them on the streets, etc. Why are they not blamed for producing CO2?
I just feel the world is up-side-down. Why don't those people for whom the energy is giving very little marginal utility to stop consuming; but the person for whom every little energy save would cause pain, like me has to take the responsibility, at no full willingness? Like to stop providing bags in supermarket, have anyone listened to my opinion?
Stop chanting it. I know what CO2 is, but no better than others.
[ 本帖最後由 spinplate 於 2009-7-9 03:31 編輯 ] |