FX-8350 偷跑

本帖最後由 hioohi 於 2012-9-25 21:06 編輯

SUPERKAMES from xtremesystems forum偷跑FX-8350




cinebench r13



cinebench r11.5
You can see the Cinebench R11.5 @4.5ghz ~ 7.7x pts .
--> at the same speed the I7 2600K ~ 8.82 pts as I know .

FX8350@4.5

FX8120@4.5


But in realworld application , with the two famous 3D aplication + renderer : 3dsmax 2011 + Vray 1.5SP5 , the thing you already know seem to be stronger.
Rendering time (second): Lower is better:
FX 8120@4.5ghz : ~ 679s
I7 2600K@4.5ghz : ~ 621s
The thing you already know :~ 580s



x264 FHD Benchmark


http://www.xtremesystems.org/for ... ns-test-fans/page33

performance per clock比上代bulldozer增長係唔同既application分別好大
x264 FHD Benchmark=+9.1%,cinebench r11.5=+4.7%,
realworld application,V-ray=+17%

what thing i already know??

TOP

睇落幾好

TOP

如果平過現時8120/8150嗰價都仲會諗下…
(利申—1100及1045使用者)

TOP

本帖最後由 hioohi 於 2012-9-25 21:09 編輯

+埋clock speed既提升,+10%
default FX8350 4Ghz比FX8150 3.6Ghz,睇呢幾個test multi-threading應該提升15-30%

TOP

AS _ _ _ _ AS FAILDOZER

TOP

用緊Q8的我表示不感興趣

TOP

SUPERKAMES from xtremesystems forum偷跑FX-8350


cinebench r13
Phenom II X6 @ 4.2GHz 都打唔贏
EPIC FAIL X2  AGAIN , Faildozer , PoopDriver (屎轉機)

AMD 你專心做好 APU  算吧啦
唔好再晒時間去整 EPIC FAIL 既 Faildozer V2.0 / V 3.0
FAIL 左就係 FAIL

You can't FIX SHI_ that's broken SO BAD

TOP

如果平過現時8120/8150嗰價都仲會諗下…
(利申—1100及1045使用者)
g1jockey 發表於 25-9-2012 09:04 PM


問題係 FX-8350 之前有人貼過post 話新賣 會賣 $2K
咁既 Performance , 叫人點買得落手 ?

我買粒 Xeon E3 Ivy Bridge 放你星唔好?

TOP

cinebench r13
Phenom II X6 @ 4.2GHz 都打唔贏
EPIC FAIL X2  AGAIN , Faildozer , PoopDriver ...
dom 發表於 2012-9-25 22:57


If you take a look at the photos again, the rumored FX-8350 @ 4.52 GHz got 7.77. The one that tied with P II X6 is a FX-8120 @ 4.51 GHz.

Not saying getting 7.77 is great. But, there is indeed improvement for Cinebench 11.5.

TOP