[分享] 企業版同普通桌面HDD o既分別

雖然企業版HDD o既MTBF比普通版高唔少, 但bad sector remapping o既持性唔一樣.
所以用o係single disk/RAID 0 environment o既話有必要考慮埋:

From Synology's wiki:
http://www.synology.com/wiki/ind ... a_Desktop-Class_HDD

Most or all HDDs which are shipped today have defective sectors, or will begin to have defective sectors as the HDD ages. HDDs today have a built-in ability of repairing defective sectors with a backup supply of sectors. This repair process is seamless to the user, and is not required for the user to perform sector remapping manually.

However, given the two aforementioned environments, sector remapping times vary greatly between the two. With a Desktop-class drive, the HDD will attempt to retrieve the data and remap the sector which is damaged, requiring as much time as several minutes. During this sector remapping process, a HDD can time out and become unresponsive to the HDD controller. Because of this, a HDD can be ejected from the controller, as the Controller believes that the HDD is defective as it is unresponsive.

This effort of using several minutes in attempting to retrieve data from a defective sector is essential for single-drive usage, as there is not another copy of the data available. However this behavior is not beneficial in RAID environments, as a drive being ejected from the RAID Controller will result in the Volume becoming degraded, due to a few bad sectors.

To resolve this, sector remapping for Enterprise-class HDD is handled differently. On an Enterprise-class HDD, the HDD will attempt to retrieve the data from the affected sector, however if it cannot be retrieve under a few seconds, the HDD will mark the sector as defective and consider the data lost. The HDD maintains a lower time interval to perform sector remapping thus to avoid timing out or being ejected from the RAID Controller. The HDD will then ask the controller to rebuild the missing data from the other Redundant drives (RAID 1, 5, 6 for example); the rebuilt data from the other drives will then be placed on a backup sector of the HDD. If an Enterprise-Class HDD is used as a single entity, or used in a RAID-0 environment, then the data on the sector which was damaged is considered lost as there are not other redundant mirrors to rebuild the affected data.

In summary, it is not recommended to use Enterprise-class HDDs as a single entity or in a non-redundant RAID environment (JBOD, RAID-0 for example)...

咁即係話如果只用單硬碟或者raid 0時,都唔應該用企業版硬碟?應該用番家用版?

TOP

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

TOP

原帖由 fongsdragon 於 2008-10-16 17:55 發表
咁即係話如果只用單硬碟或者raid 0時,都唔應該用企業版硬碟?應該用番家用版?


o既然知道分別, 我會咁建議

TOP

原帖由 toni0019 於 2008-10-16 19:38 發表
企業版HDD 有五年保係股歡迎的原因


5年保養係...
但對data safety冇幫助呢

TOP

HDD 對 Raid Card 兼容都有分別

TOP

嘩!原來係咁,仲以為 enterprise class hd 用料好D,用番係 desktop 咪超正。原來不是這樣。

TOP

如果係咁,咁企業級o既 HDD 咪唔可以攞o黎做 STB o既外置 HDD!仲諗住買隻番o黎 7x24 開住o黎用添。

BTW,而家仲有冇 AV 用o既 HDD 賣呀?

TOP

原帖由 TecraM2V 於 2008-10-16 21:38 發表
如果係咁,咁企業級o既 HDD 咪唔可以攞o黎做 STB o既外置 HDD!仲諗住買隻番o黎 7x24 開住o黎用添。

BTW,而家仲有冇 AV 用o既 HDD 賣呀?

CinemaStar

TOP

原帖由 bmkwong 於 2008-10-16 21:31 發表
嘩!原來係咁,仲以為 enterprise class hd 用料好D,用番係 desktop 咪超正。原來不是這樣。


1,200,000 hrs壽命我都相信用料好d, 問題係佢設計黎俾redundent RAID用, 所以唔會做retrieve data from bad sector o既動作

TOP